4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 343:
Line 343: + + + + + + + +
→Comments
I am not sure it is correct to say that Mass. has same-sex marriage under the definition given in the article. Two Mass. people of the same sex can have the same Mass. legal status as a marriage between a man and a woman, but not the same under federal law. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:19, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
I am not sure it is correct to say that Mass. has same-sex marriage under the definition given in the article. Two Mass. people of the same sex can have the same Mass. legal status as a marriage between a man and a woman, but not the same under federal law. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:19, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
:What did you have in mind to do about it? Qualify any statements about Massachusetts in the article, accordingly? Tweak the definition, which I don't think is quite right but didn't want to tinker with myself?
:The article currently says only that Massachusetts is "the sole state to issue same-sex marriage licenses." I don't think it actually says anywhere that "Massachusetts has same-sex marriage."
:Or are you just pointing this out as relevant to discussions here on the talk page?
::[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:13, 15 May 2007 (EDT)