SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,403
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 47:
Line 47: + + + + + +
Talk:Project for the New American Century (view source)
Revision as of 17:22, March 22, 2020
, 17:22, March 22, 2020→PNAC and 9/11: new section
:::OK, no big deal. It's just a simple phrase used in RAD; if it's not mentioned anywhere other than a few places in the RAD document, then it's obviously not official and thus not worth adding to the page. -[[User:RedBlade7|danq]] 18:25, 8 December 2007 (EST)
:::OK, no big deal. It's just a simple phrase used in RAD; if it's not mentioned anywhere other than a few places in the RAD document, then it's obviously not official and thus not worth adding to the page. -[[User:RedBlade7|danq]] 18:25, 8 December 2007 (EST)
== PNAC and 9/11 ==
Lately, I've been flirting with 9/11 truth theories. I don't believe the towers were blown up by explosives, nor do I think bin Laden was innocent. But I do believe at least some members of our government knew about the attacks in advance and intentionally did nothing, for political reasons. I also wouldn't be surprised if at least one person in our government was an active participant in the 9/11 plot, given the US and al-Qaeda's mutual ties to Saudi Arabia.
That being said, the fact that PNAC discussed "a new Pearl Harbor"just twelve months before 9/11 is ''very'' suspicious to me. Can I edit the article to discuss this? I know 9/11 is such a sensitive topic and I don't want to end up getting blocked for making a controversial edit about it.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:22, 22 March 2020 (EDT)