Changes

According to McTaggart, Goodwin took a third of her book without making attribution. She said that she felt that Goodwin had "lifted out the heart and guts of somebody else's individual expression." McTaggart and Goodwin entered into a "private settlement"' over the matter. In an article in ''[[Time]]'' [[magazine]], Goodwin said, "Though my footnotes repeatedly cited Ms. McTaggart's work, I failed to provide quotation marks for phrases that I had taken verbatim ... The larger question for those of us who write history is to understand how citation mistakes can happen."<ref>Doris Kearns Goodwin: "How I Caused that Story," ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]],''January 27, 2002.</ref>

According to McTaggart, Goodwin took a third of her book without making attribution. She said that she felt that Goodwin had "lifted out the heart and guts of somebody else's individual expression." McTaggart and Goodwin entered into a "private settlement"' over the matter. In an article in ''[[Time]]'' [[magazine]], Goodwin said, "Though my footnotes repeatedly cited Ms. McTaggart's work, I failed to provide quotation marks for phrases that I had taken verbatim ... The larger question for those of us who write history is to understand how citation mistakes can happen."<ref>Doris Kearns Goodwin: "How I Caused that Story," ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]],''January 27, 2002.</ref>

In its analysis of the controversy, the liberal ''[[Slate]'' magazine reported that Goodwin failed to correct the problem of plagiarism in subsequent editions of her book.<ref name=tnoah>{{cite web|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2002/01/how_to_curb_the_plagiarism_epidemic.html|title=How To Curb the Plagiarism Epidemic|publisher=''Slate'' magazine|date=January 28, 2002|accessdate=March 23, 2020}}</ref> ''Slate'' also claimed that  multiple passages in Goodwin's book on the [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|Roosevelts]], entitled ''No Ordinary Time,'' were apparently taken from Joseph Lash's ''Eleanor and Franklin'' and Hugh Gregory Gallagher's ''FDR's Splendid Deception,'' although she "scrupulously" placed footnotes in the material cited ''[[Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]'' reported problems with ''The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys.'' The multiple accusations of plagiarism accusations prompted Goodwin to resign from the board which selects the winners of the [[Pulitzer Prize]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2002/aug/04/nation/na-goodwin4|title=As History Repeats Itself, the Scholar Becomes the Story|publisher=''[[Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]''|author=Peter H. King|accessdate=March 23, 2020}}</ref><ref name=tnoah/>

In its analysis of the controversy, the liberal ''[[Slate]]'' magazine reported that Goodwin failed to correct the problem of plagiarism in subsequent editions of her book.<ref name=tnoah>{{cite web|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2002/01/how_to_curb_the_plagiarism_epidemic.html|title=How To Curb the Plagiarism Epidemic|author=Timothy Noah|publisher=''Slate'' magazine|date=January 28, 2002|accessdate=March 23, 2020}}</ref> ''Slate'' also claimed that  multiple passages in Goodwin's book on the [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|Roosevelts]], entitled ''No Ordinary Time,'' were apparently taken from Joseph Lash's ''Eleanor and Franklin'' and Hugh Gregory Gallagher's ''FDR's Splendid Deception,'' although she "scrupulously" placed footnotes in the material cited ''[[Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]'' reported problems with ''The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys.'' The multiple accusations of plagiarism accusations prompted Goodwin to resign from the board which selects the winners of the [[Pulitzer Prize]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2002/aug/04/nation/na-goodwin4|title=As History Repeats Itself, the Scholar Becomes the Story|publisher=''[[Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]''|author=Peter H. King|accessdate=March 23, 2020}}</ref><ref name=tnoah/>

==References==

==References==