nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 326:
Line 326: +
→Eternal Universe?: Only things that began need a cause
You think way too pre-relativity, time and space are connected and foldable: time is not absolute! Besides, if everything needs a cause in linear time, then why doesn't that supernatural being need an origin and cause as well?
You think way too pre-relativity, time and space are connected and foldable: time is not absolute! Besides, if everything needs a cause in linear time, then why doesn't that supernatural being need an origin and cause as well?
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]
:I know time is not absolute, but I don't know how that affects what I was saying. Not everything needs a cause; only things that have a beginning need a cause, and God has no beginning. Ultimately ''something'' must be eternal, in order to provide a cause for things that have a beginning, else you get into endless regression. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:13, 15 May 2007 (EDT)