Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Giuliani is a Republican but as for social conservative issues, he is too liberal. He might be the Presidential nominee of our party. I kept asking myself, how could I vote for somebody pro-abortion and pro-gay rights? Then I heard a unique viewpoint I thought I should share. If we do not elect a President strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy, there might not be an America left to have abortions. I certainly want my child to grow up in a safe secure America. Giuliani is strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy. In a time of war, this nation cannot afford to take chances with a Democrat President.
 
Giuliani is a Republican but as for social conservative issues, he is too liberal. He might be the Presidential nominee of our party. I kept asking myself, how could I vote for somebody pro-abortion and pro-gay rights? Then I heard a unique viewpoint I thought I should share. If we do not elect a President strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy, there might not be an America left to have abortions. I certainly want my child to grow up in a safe secure America. Giuliani is strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy. In a time of war, this nation cannot afford to take chances with a Democrat President.
   −
Giuliani was mayor of New York City, he has no foreign policy experience at all, none. He also has no experience in National security he never served in the military and avoided service during the Vietnam War so he could become a lawyer. He is not fit to be Command in Chief of the US military or lead this country in global affairs. His moral values are none existant, married and divorced several times and having very public affairs. If he is the best 'Republican' for the job, that is a sorry state to be in.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 02:41, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Giuliani was mayor of New York City, he has no foreign policy experience at all, none. He also has no experience in National security he never served in the military and avoided service during the Vietnam War so he could become a lawyer. He is not fit to be Command in Chief of the US military or lead this country in global affairs. His moral values are none existent, married and divorced several times and having very public affairs. If he is the best 'Republican' for the job, that is a sorry state to be in.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 02:41, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
What makes you think being the mayor of New York City does not involve foreign policy? Republican leadership maybe in a precarious position, would you trust America to a Democrat leader??? What makes him not fit to Commander-in-chief besides his backwards social issues? He says keep up the fight against terrorists. He believes in a strong miltary like Reagan. Eljoe, believe me, I am with you, his gun rights stand, his equal rights for gays stand, his abortion stand is terrible, multiple marriages. I am married and do not believe in divorce either. He is the front runner, you have to think of the consequences of letting a Democrat in the White House or a former Democrat, Giuliani. If it comes down to it, an abortion right Democrat versus an abortion rights Republican, we lose no matter what. But, we do not have to lose America as a result of not voting. It must be a Republican in our future. We cannot afford a liberal defeatist the top job in the land. Just my OP --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:08, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
+
What makes you think being the mayor of New York City does not involve foreign policy? Republican leadership maybe in a precarious position, would you trust America to a Democrat leader??? What makes him not fit to Commander-in-chief besides his backwards social issues? He says keep up the fight against terrorists. He believes in a strong military like Reagan. Eljoe, believe me, I am with you, his gun rights stand, his equal rights for gays stand, his abortion stand is terrible, multiple marriages. I am married and do not believe in divorce either. He is the front runner, you have to think of the consequences of letting a Democrat in the White House or a former Democrat, Giuliani. If it comes down to it, an abortion right Democrat versus an abortion rights Republican, we lose no matter what. But, we do not have to lose America as a result of not voting. It must be a Republican in our future. We cannot afford a liberal defeatist the top job in the land. Just my OP --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:08, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
    
What would make Giuliani unfit for Commander-in Chief? How about Bernard Kerik for starters?
 
What would make Giuliani unfit for Commander-in Chief? How about Bernard Kerik for starters?
Line 27: Line 27:  
: Eljoe, I realize you are dead against Giuliani, so what, if he's the nominee, vote Clinton, what do I care. You are wrong is how I see it. I guess you speak for all the firefighters, even NYC ones that post good things about him on joinrudy.com Do I trust the firefighters union? They were the first union in America to give their backing to Kerry 'o4. Like I said, kerik is a non issue but except to you only. Keep tearing the man down, maybe we will have a better nominee, like your fav senior citizen McCain.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 14:30, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
 
: Eljoe, I realize you are dead against Giuliani, so what, if he's the nominee, vote Clinton, what do I care. You are wrong is how I see it. I guess you speak for all the firefighters, even NYC ones that post good things about him on joinrudy.com Do I trust the firefighters union? They were the first union in America to give their backing to Kerry 'o4. Like I said, kerik is a non issue but except to you only. Keep tearing the man down, maybe we will have a better nominee, like your fav senior citizen McCain.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 14:30, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
   −
See this is the problem with the conservative republican voter right now, no attention to the quaility of the candidate, they'll turn a blind eye to all the candidate's faults as long as they are a brand name and Guiuliani is a brand name. He's done nothing since he was mayor in 2001 just ride his popularity from 9/11. He wants to spend federal money on abortion...no big deal, he's all for gay marriage...no big deal, his major endorsemnet to head Homeland Security to protect the US turns out to be a criminal...no big deal, decided to dodge Vietnam and avoid service to his country...no big deal. If thats the candidate you want, then you've already lost.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:17, 10 April 2007 (EDT)  
+
See this is the problem with the conservative republican voter right now, no attention to the quality of the candidate, they'll turn a blind eye to all the candidate's faults as long as they are a brand name and Guiuliani is a brand name. He's done nothing since he was mayor in 2001 just ride his popularity from 9/11. He wants to spend federal money on abortion...no big deal, he's all for gay marriage...no big deal, his major endorsement to head Homeland Security to protect the US turns out to be a criminal...no big deal, decided to dodge Vietnam and avoid service to his country...no big deal. If thats the candidate you want, then you've already lost.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:17, 10 April 2007 (EDT)  
   −
If quality is such a big isssue for conservative republicans, should we not have voted for Reagan? He did in fact have a marriage and divorce before Nancy. He was at one point of his life, a liberal thinker. Nobody is without sin. I am curious eljoe, so much hate for the man, you must have your reasons but I see you as blind, not me. Hey I am all for Brownback as President. Reality tells me somebody else will have the nomination. If you keep waiting for a true conservative Republican savior, you will be dissapointed. If you hope that Republicans will continue to lead the Presidency, you have hope! You and Mountain Dew boycott Republicans because there is no right of center candidate, America loses. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:50, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
+
If quality is such a big issue for conservative republicans, should we not have voted for Reagan? He did in fact have a marriage and divorce before Nancy. He was at one point of his life, a liberal thinker. Nobody is without sin. I am curious eljoe, so much hate for the man, you must have your reasons but I see you as blind, not me. Hey I am all for Brownback as President. Reality tells me somebody else will have the nomination. If you keep waiting for a true conservative Republican savior, you will be disappointed. If you hope that Republicans will continue to lead the Presidency, you have hope! You and Mountain Dew boycott Republicans because there is no right of center candidate, America loses. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:50, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
     
4,604

edits

Navigation menu