Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
875
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: − + + +
→Dumezil22
*1, Corrupt is corrupt, no? The Times says they were corrupt.
*1, Corrupt is corrupt, no? The Times says they were corrupt.
*2, She was NEVER removed!! Try to get it! She declined to stand for a second vote, when her advisors and she realized she wouldn't have the votes! THAT MEANS SHE WAS NOT REMOVED, But DECLINED TO STAND FOR A VOTE! It is the difference between being sacked, or allowed to resign!
*2, She was NEVER removed!! Try to get it! She declined to stand for a second vote, when her advisors and she realized she wouldn't have the votes! THAT MEANS SHE WAS NOT REMOVED, But DECLINED TO STAND FOR A VOTE! It is the difference between being sacked, or allowed to resign!
::Being there at the time, it was absolutely clear that although she chose to not stand for re-election as leader in the second poll (and so was not defeated), she was definitely forced out of office against her will. Her initial reaction after the first poll was to carry on - it took a few days for the reality of her position to sink in. By not standing, candidates more to her liking than arch-enemy Heseltine were able to throw their hats into the ring, allowing senior minister John Major to take over. I would advocate using the phrase "forced from office" rather than "defeated" or "allowed to resign" as a more accurate reflection of what actually happened. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 08:47, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
*3, It means not a wit where someone is from. Here the rules are, use American spelling and customs. Start your own UK Conservapedia, and enforce your customs there. --[[User:TK|TK]] 10:34, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
*3, It means not a wit where someone is from. Here the rules are, use American spelling and customs. Start your own UK Conservapedia, and enforce your customs there. --[[User:TK|TK]] 10:34, 18 March 2007 (EDT)