| Line 38: |
Line 38: |
| | '''James Clapper''' (born March 14, 1941) served as the [[Director of National Intelligence]] throughout most of the [[Obama administration]]. | | '''James Clapper''' (born March 14, 1941) served as the [[Director of National Intelligence]] throughout most of the [[Obama administration]]. |
| | | | |
| − | Clapper illegally leaked the ''[[Clinton-Steele dossier]]'' to [[CNN]], lied to Congress about it, and was rewarded by CNN with a contract.<ref>''[https://www.scribd.com/document/377590825/HPSCI-Final-Report-on-Russian-Active-Measures-Redacted-Release Russian Active Measures in the 2016 Election''], House Permanent Sub Committee on Intelligence, March 22, 2017, pp. 107-108.</ref><ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/29976/cnn-rewarded-obama-official-contract-after-leaking-ryan-saavedra </ref> Clapper has given the [[Nuremberg Defense]] for the many [[crime]]s committed by tje Obama [[intelligence community]].<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7U57COJVNs</ref> | + | Clapper illegally leaked the ''[[Clinton-Steele dossier]]'' to [[CNN]], lied to Congress about it, and was rewarded by CNN with a contract.<ref>''[https://www.scribd.com/document/377590825/HPSCI-Final-Report-on-Russian-Active-Measures-Redacted-Release Russian Active Measures in the 2016 Election''], House Permanent Sub Committee on Intelligence, March 22, 2017, pp. 107-108.</ref><ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/29976/cnn-rewarded-obama-official-contract-after-leaking-ryan-saavedra</ref> Clapper has given the [[Nuremberg Defense]] for the many [[crime]]s committed by the Obama [[intelligence community]].<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7U57COJVNs</ref> |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Line 49: |
Line 49: |
| | | | |
| | ==Clinton email coverup== | | ==Clinton email coverup== |
| − | The [[FBI]] released documents under the [[Freedom of Information Act]] in early September 2016 from the [[Hillary Clinton email investigation]] which was now closed.<ref>https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-documents-in-hillary-clinton-e-mail-investigation</ref><ref>[http://wordpress.redirectingat.com/?id=725X1342&site=theconservativetreehouse.wordpress.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scribd.com%2Fdoc%2F322860635&xguid=&xuuid=588a6ed7067ae07312dcf83a11d9c228&xsessid=&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconservativetreehouse.com%2F2018%2F02%2F08%2Fmike-is-out-michael-p-kortan-quits-fbi%2F&pref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2F&xtz=420]</ref> The release includes FBI form 302 interview reports. Some details from the July 2, 2016 (302) interview with [[Hillary Clinton]] were intentionally withheld.<ref>[https://www.scribd.com/document/322860731/Clinton-FBI-Emails-File-2?ad_group=725X700959X044dae4a90d5eb36212ea25ed72daf15&campaign=Skimbit%2C+Ltd.&content=10079&irgwc=1&keyword=ft750noi&medium=affiliate&source=impactradius]</ref> FBI counterintelligence agent [[Peter Strzok]] who participated in the interview admitted in a text [[Lisa Page]], special counsel to FBI Deputy Director [[Andrew McCabe]], that a group at the highest levels of the FBI, including himself, conspired to withhold some of the information from [[Congress]] and the American people:{{Quotebox|“there are VERY inflammatory things in the 302s we didn’t turn over to [Congress]…that are going to come out in FOIA and absolutely inflames Congress. I’m sure [[James A. Baker (DOJ)|Jim [Baker] ]] and [[Trisha Anderson|Trisha [Trisha Beth Anderson] ]] and [[David Laufman|Dave [Laufmen] ]] and [[Mike Kortan|Mike [Kortan] ]] are all considering how things like that play out as they talk amongst themselves.”}} Days later James Clapper's Office of the [[Director of National Intelligence]] announced, in violation of Intelligence Community Directive ICD 732, that no [[Intelligence Community]]-wide damage assessment into Secretary Clinton's security breaches would be conducted. ODNI ignored all subsequent [[FOIA]] requests. | + | The [[FBI]] released documents under the [[Freedom of Information Act]] in early September 2016 from the [[Hillary Clinton email investigation]] which was now closed.<ref>https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-documents-in-hillary-clinton-e-mail-investigation</ref><ref>[http://wordpress.redirectingat.com/?id=725X1342&site=theconservativetreehouse.wordpress.com&xs=1&isjs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scribd.com%2Fdoc%2F322860635&xguid=&xuuid=588a6ed7067ae07312dcf83a11d9c228&xsessid=&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconservativetreehouse.com%2F2018%2F02%2F08%2Fmike-is-out-michael-p-kortan-quits-fbi%2F&pref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2F&xtz=420]</ref> The release includes FBI form 302 interview reports. Some details from the July 2, 2016 (302) interview with [[Hillary Clinton]] were intentionally withheld.<ref>[https://www.scribd.com/document/322860731/Clinton-FBI-Emails-File-2?ad_group=725X700959X044dae4a90d5eb36212ea25ed72daf15&campaign=Skimbit%2C+Ltd.&content=10079&irgwc=1&keyword=ft750noi&medium=affiliate&source=impactradius]</ref> FBI counterintelligence agent [[Peter Strzok]] who participated in the interview admitted in a text [[Lisa Page]], special counsel to FBI Deputy Director [[Andrew McCabe]], that a group at the highest levels of the FBI, including himself, conspired to withhold some of the information from [[Congress]] and the American people:{{Quotebox|“there are VERY inflammatory things in the 302s we didn’t turn over to [Congress]…that are going to come out in FOIA and absolutely inflames Congress. I’m sure [[James A. Baker (DOJ)|Jim [Baker] ]] and [[Trisha Anderson|Trisha [Trisha Beth Anderson] ]] and [[David Laufman|Dave [Laufmen] ]] and [[Mike Kortan|Mike [Kortan] ]] are all considering how things like that play out as they talk amongst themselves.”}} Days later James Clapper's Office of the [[Director of National Intelligence]] announced, in violation of Intelligence Community Directive ICD 732, that no [[Intelligence Community]]-wide damage assessment into Secretary Clinton's security breaches would be conducted. ODNI ignored all subsequent [[FOIA]] requests. |
| | | | |
| | ==Intelligence Community Assessment== | | ==Intelligence Community Assessment== |
| Line 56: |
Line 56: |
| | The ICA did not reflect the consensus of the [[intelligence community]]. Clapper broke with tradition and decided not to put the assessment out to all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies for review. Instead, he limited input to a couple dozen chosen analysts from just three agencies — the [[CIA]], [[NSA]] and [[FBI]]. Agencies with relevant expertise on [[Russia]], such as the [[Department of Homeland Security]], [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] and the [[State Department]]'s intelligence bureau, were excluded from the process. | | The ICA did not reflect the consensus of the [[intelligence community]]. Clapper broke with tradition and decided not to put the assessment out to all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies for review. Instead, he limited input to a couple dozen chosen analysts from just three agencies — the [[CIA]], [[NSA]] and [[FBI]]. Agencies with relevant expertise on [[Russia]], such as the [[Department of Homeland Security]], [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] and the [[State Department]]'s intelligence bureau, were excluded from the process. |
| | | | |
| − | Contravening intelligence community tradecraft standards that Clapper himself ordered in 2015, Congress found that the ICA did not properly describe the “quality and credibility of underlying sources” and was not “independent of political considerations." The process was skewed and manipulated to reach a predetermined conclusion that the incoming Republican president was compromised by the Russians.<ref>[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/14/2_colleagues_contradict_brennan_on_use_of_dossier.html] </ref> | + | Contravening intelligence community tradecraft standards that Clapper himself ordered in 2015, Congress found that the ICA did not properly describe the “quality and credibility of underlying sources” and was not “independent of political considerations." The process was skewed and manipulated to reach a predetermined conclusion that the incoming Republican president was compromised by the Russians.<ref>[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/14/2_colleagues_contradict_brennan_on_use_of_dossier.html]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==Illegal leaking== | | ==Illegal leaking== |
| Line 78: |
Line 78: |
| | {{Quotebox|"This was simply an extension of uh, the original, uh, [[FISA]] request. Meaning that, or implying, that apparently, there was information that was considered, uh, ‘valuable’, that was being obtained, via the initial FISA request. | | {{Quotebox|"This was simply an extension of uh, the original, uh, [[FISA]] request. Meaning that, or implying, that apparently, there was information that was considered, uh, ‘valuable’, that was being obtained, via the initial FISA request. |
| | | | |
| − | When the time was up for the initial FISA report, FISA request, then it was time to get an extension.<ref>https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/05/15/the-steele-dossier-the-intelligence-community-assessment/ </ref>}} | + | When the time was up for the initial FISA report, FISA request, then it was time to get an extension.<ref>https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/05/15/the-steele-dossier-the-intelligence-community-assessment/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| | ==Spying on public figures== | | ==Spying on public figures== |