Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: − + Line 28:
Line 28: − + Line 43:
Line 43: − + − + Line 52:
Line 52: − + − + Line 67:
Line 67: − +
Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: doesn’t → doesn't (2), … → ... (2), it’s → it's, they’ve → they've (2), ’s → 's
For example: ignoring creation scientists’ research merely because their results are more conclusive and sensible than your own
For example: ignoring creation scientists’ research merely because their results are more conclusive and sensible than your own
'''Just because it doesn’t rigidly adhere to the scientific method does not mean it’s not “scientific”''' <br>
'''Just because it doesn't rigidly adhere to the scientific method does not mean it's not “scientific”''' <br>
For example: saying that a fossil has to be particular age, yet not referencing instances of fossils being formed in very short matters of time<ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/fossil.asp 50yr-old fossil]</ref>
For example: saying that a fossil has to be particular age, yet not referencing instances of fossils being formed in very short matters of time<ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/fossil.asp 50yr-old fossil]</ref>
'''Do not define controls, limitations, or experimental conditions when discussing your experiment or its conclusion(s)'''<br>
'''Do not define controls, limitations, or experimental conditions when discussing your experiment or its conclusion(s)'''<br>
For example: liberal [[Global warming theory|“climatologists”]] neglecting to mention that they’ve only been collecting data for a few decades, yet are making claims about multi-million year trends; this is how they perpetuate the myth of man-made global warming<ref>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JCli....7.1144K Harvard study]</ref>
For example: liberal [[Global warming theory|“climatologists”]] neglecting to mention that they've only been collecting data for a few decades, yet are making claims about multi-million year trends; this is how they perpetuate the myth of man-made global warming<ref>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JCli....7.1144K Harvard study]</ref>
'''Give anecdotal evidence rather than proposing a detailed, testable mechanism''' <br>
'''Give anecdotal evidence rather than proposing a detailed, testable mechanism''' <br>
==Analyzing Junk Science==
==Analyzing Junk Science==
'''''In the mind of the atheistic junk scientist…'''''
'''''In the mind of the atheistic junk scientist...'''''
'''Do not acknowledge mistakes in, flaws of, or future improvements to your study'''<br>
'''Do not acknowledge mistakes in, flaws of, or future improvements to your study'''<br>
For example, never consider that whatever “climate change” we’re enduring might be a temporary, and normal, shift in temperature as has happened several times in Earth’s history
For example, never consider that whatever “climate change” we’re enduring might be a temporary, and normal, shift in temperature as has happened several times in Earth's history
'''Cite the smallest variety of references possible'''<br>
'''Cite the smallest variety of references possible'''<br>
<ref>[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/aug/15/the-hottest-year-1934/ Washington Times]</ref>
<ref>[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/aug/15/the-hottest-year-1934/ Washington Times]</ref>
'''If it hasn’t be proven false, then it must be true (and vice versa)'''<br>
'''If it hasn't be proven false, then it must be true (and vice versa)'''<br>
==Publishing Junk Science==
==Publishing Junk Science==
'''''In the mind of the atheistic junk scientist…'''''<br>
'''''In the mind of the atheistic junk scientist...'''''<br>
'''Do not cite, acknowledge, discuss, or consider alternative data or conclusions''' <br>
'''Do not cite, acknowledge, discuss, or consider alternative data or conclusions''' <br>
'''Your conclusion is irrefutable once it has been reached''' <br>
'''Your conclusion is irrefutable once it has been reached''' <br>
For example: Darwinist scientists refusing to consider new paradigms proposed by creation science as they’ve been researched<ref>[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=CSC Discovery Institute]</ref>
For example: Darwinist scientists refusing to consider new paradigms proposed by creation science as they've been researched<ref>[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=CSC Discovery Institute]</ref>
'''Emphasize the implications of your discovery rather than the details of it'''<br>
'''Emphasize the implications of your discovery rather than the details of it'''<br>