1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
→No expressed grant: I was just removing some of the exaggerated language of the text before
RSchlafly, what you are basically implying in your last edit is that the United States has no legally enforceable habeas corpus protection for its citizens. Um...[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:34, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
RSchlafly, what you are basically implying in your last edit is that the United States has no legally enforceable habeas corpus protection for its citizens. Um...[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:34, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
: No, I am not saying that. I was just removing some of the exaggerated language of the text before. It said that the "Constitution enshrines the right" when it really just mentions it indirectly. It said " highly specified conditions" when the Const. just says "unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it". Then it has some misleading statements about what the "Founders intended". I was just trimming down to actual facts. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:40, 16 May 2007 (EDT)