Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Godless: The Church of Liberalism (view source)
Revision as of 15:54, May 16, 2007
, 15:54, May 16, 2007The Jersey Girls flap was merely a PR attack on Coulter
:: She did say those things, she truly is an awful woman. Should we delete her articles?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:: She did say those things, she truly is an awful woman. Should we delete her articles?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
==Jersey widows==
Among the more controversial sections of the book was Ann Coulter’s attack on several women who had lost their husbands in 9/11 and had voiced criticism of President Bush’s approach to terrorism:
“These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis.... I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much ... how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy.”
----
This was not "controversial", let alone "more controversial". Rather, this was a section which liberals '''objected to'''. An objection does not make a controversy. There is only a controversy when there are two sides, and a debate goes on and on about an issue.
The Jersey Girls flap was merely a PR attack on Coulter and does not deserve mention in the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:54, 16 May 2007 (EDT)