Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 384: Line 384:  
: This is indeed a criticism (although I don't agree exactly about the idea of marriage being common to *all* cultures), but the same-sex marriage debate does often collapse into the slippery-slope argument.  Santorum was mercifully mocked for making exactly that argument, for example.  It's not the only argument, but it is a frequent argument and probably deserves some coverage here.  [[User:Brainslug|Brainslug]] 13:06, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
: This is indeed a criticism (although I don't agree exactly about the idea of marriage being common to *all* cultures), but the same-sex marriage debate does often collapse into the slippery-slope argument.  Santorum was mercifully mocked for making exactly that argument, for example.  It's not the only argument, but it is a frequent argument and probably deserves some coverage here.  [[User:Brainslug|Brainslug]] 13:06, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::Yes, once we get to current politics.  But marriage itself must be defined first, and it is not defined by agenda driven activists seeking to redefine it right now.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:09, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::Yes, once we get to current politics.  But marriage itself must be defined first, and it is not defined by agenda driven activists seeking to redefine it right now.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:09, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Ed, re your question a few posts up:  2 consenting adults is maybe the most important difference between SSM and the other things you mention.  In your view, aside from the anatomy, what's the distinction between SSM and "traditional" marriage? [[User:Murray|Murray]] 14:15, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
953

edits

Navigation menu