Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 388:
Line 388: + +
→Section on [[%22Same-sex_marriage%22#Line-drawing_and_the_.22slippery_slope.22_argument|Line-Drawing & Gay Rights]]: Dr. Dobson
::::Let's call it the "anti-procreationist lobby". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:48, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
::::Let's call it the "anti-procreationist lobby". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:48, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::Not sure I understand the objection. Could you flesh it out a bit? Thanks. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 15:15, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::Not sure I understand the objection. Could you flesh it out a bit? Thanks. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 15:15, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::Dr. Dobson says,
::::::''Opponents of traditional marriage suggest legislative action to redefine marriage as something other than between a man and a woman simply masks the real homosexual agenda, the intent to destroy marriage altogether. With marriage as we know it gone, everyone would enjoy all the legal benefits of marriage (custody rights, tax-free inheritance, joint ownership of property, health care and spousal citizenship, etc.,) '''without limiting the number of partners or their gender.'''''[http://www.conservapedia.com/%22Same-sex_marriage%22#Issues]