Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:  
Look, I don't have to offer a cite for Scalia not liking Brown; that's not what I'm positing.  I am proving, well I might add, that Scalia does disagree with the underpinning of the Brown decision as written by Earl Warren.  The logic is plain and clear; you can attack each element of the argument, but it's plan 1->2 2->3 ergo 1->3.  Transitive property.  Bam.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 15:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Look, I don't have to offer a cite for Scalia not liking Brown; that's not what I'm positing.  I am proving, well I might add, that Scalia does disagree with the underpinning of the Brown decision as written by Earl Warren.  The logic is plain and clear; you can attack each element of the argument, but it's plan 1->2 2->3 ergo 1->3.  Transitive property.  Bam.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 15:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
Sometimes people who call themselves "conservatives" are in disagreement with others who call themselves "conservatives". Is there such a thing as a true conservative or are there libertarian conservatives, religious conservatives, authoriatarian conservatives, etc?
+
Sometimes people who call themselves "conservatives" are in disagreement with others who call themselves "conservatives". Is there such a thing as a true conservative or are there libertarian conservatives, religious conservatives, authoritarian conservatives, etc?
    
: There is a difference.  This is young-earth-creationist-scientific-fact-denying-dinosaurs-and-humans-coexisted-apedia.  A real Conservapedia would be very different.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:21, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
: There is a difference.  This is young-earth-creationist-scientific-fact-denying-dinosaurs-and-humans-coexisted-apedia.  A real Conservapedia would be very different.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:21, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
132

edits

Navigation menu