Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,464
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 281:
Line 281: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Worst Liberal Movies (view source)
Revision as of 23:10, May 18, 2020
, 23:10, May 18, 2020→Add a disclaimer?: new section
*Regarding Exorcist, was that BEFORE or DURING her demonic possession? Because if it's the latter, I don't think that was a promotion of blasphemy (and if anything showcased something was deeply wrong about her). [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 22:08, 14 November 2019 (EST)
*Regarding Exorcist, was that BEFORE or DURING her demonic possession? Because if it's the latter, I don't think that was a promotion of blasphemy (and if anything showcased something was deeply wrong about her). [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 22:08, 14 November 2019 (EST)
== Add a disclaimer? ==
I think there should be a disclaimer or warning at the top of all "Worst Liberal..." articles saying something to the effect of "We do not care if a movie/TV show/video game is considered a 'classic' or that it's a famous movie/TV show/video game that many people have nostalgia for. If it has liberal elements and/or the creators of a certain movie/TV show/video game had some liberal agenda in mind when they crafted the story's narrative, we will call it out. Just because people love movies doesn't mean that Hollywood isn't trying to push a liberal agenda with them." As an example, many people love the Star Wars movies, but that doesn't change the fact that the concept of "the Force" is based on Pantheism, which is un-biblical. It also does not change the fact that George Lucas based the Ewoks on the Vietcong based on his slanted misunderstanding of the Vietnam War. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 19:10, 18 May 2020 (EDT)