53
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + +
no edit summary
::The article below looks good to me ... I say put it back. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:16, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::The article below looks good to me ... I say put it back. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:16, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:::So who wants to get banned for doing it? Knowing that it will be reverted immediately, also? I suppose the ''real'' "problem" with it is all that "millions of years ago" stuff, without a YEC refutation of some sort. Or perhaps it needs to say something like "Most geologists believe..." or some such qualification. It's a pity that it got killed, as I was going to use the article as a launch point sometime to create articles about those red-linked invertebrates. [[User:Human|Human]] 17:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
:::So who wants to get banned for doing it? Knowing that it will be reverted immediately, also? I suppose the ''real'' "problem" with it is all that "millions of years ago" stuff, without a YEC refutation of some sort. Or perhaps it needs to say something like "Most geologists believe..." or some such qualification. It's a pity that it got killed, as I was going to use the article as a launch point sometime to create articles about those red-linked invertebrates. [[User:Human|Human]] 17:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
The current article, and all other epoch articles currently "improved" by Conservative are ridiculous. Cutting and pasting a pointless YEC critique and a list of YECaganda websites to each and everyone seems silly at best. [[User:QNA|QNA]] 19:53, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
----
----