Changes

The pro-abortion movement always attempts to justify itself with the term "pro-choice".  They claim to support a mother's "choice" to abort her unborn child, but many either don't support even a mother's choice to ''keep'' her unborn child or they dismiss occurrences of such as isolated incidents.  

The pro-abortion movement always attempts to justify itself with the term "pro-choice".  They claim to support a mother's "choice" to abort her unborn child, but many either don't support even a mother's choice to ''keep'' her unborn child or they dismiss occurrences of such as isolated incidents.  

In December 2011, a 14 year-old pregnant teen sued several family members for attempting to coerce her into an abortion.  Her attorney representing her, Stephen Casey, attested that the girl's cousin was guilty of assaulting her and threatening to beat her if she did not get an abortion.  The teen later got a restraining order from her family following the lawsuit.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/10/teen-spared-for-two-more-weeks-from-parents-forcing-abortion/ Teen Spared For Two More Weeks From Parents Forcing Abortion]</ref>  

In December 2011, a 14-year-old pregnant teen sued several family members for attempting to coerce her into an abortion.  Her attorney representing her, Stephen Casey, attested that the girl's cousin was guilty of assaulting her and threatening to beat her if she did not get an abortion.  The teen later got a restraining order from her family following the lawsuit.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/10/teen-spared-for-two-more-weeks-from-parents-forcing-abortion/ Teen Spared For Two More Weeks From Parents Forcing Abortion]</ref>  

In February 2013, a 16 year-old pregnant teen from Texas sued her parents for trying to force her to get an abortion.  The teen said that her mother invited her paternal grandparents to a bar where her mother suggested slipping an abortion pill through deception.  The teen also stated that her father intended to get her an abortion simply because it was his decision, as well as her parents further "punishing" her by taking away her phone, keeping her from school, and taking away her car.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2013/02/12/teen-girl-sues-parents-to-stop-them-from-forcing-her-abortion/ Teen Girl Sues Parents to Stop Them From Forcing Her Abortion]</ref>

In February 2013, a 16-year-old pregnant teen from Texas sued her parents for trying to force her to get an abortion.  The teen said that her mother invited her paternal grandparents to a bar where her mother suggested slipping an abortion pill through deception.  The teen also stated that her father intended to get her an abortion simply because it was his decision, as well as her parents further "punishing" her by taking away her phone, keeping her from school, and taking away her car.<ref>[https://www.lifenews.com/2013/02/12/teen-girl-sues-parents-to-stop-them-from-forcing-her-abortion/ Teen Girl Sues Parents to Stop Them From Forcing Her Abortion]</ref>

In July 2019, a UK court ordered an abortion to be forced on a 22-week pregnant mother that was mentally disabled.  Madame Justice Nathalie Lieven deemed the 22-week old fetus as "not a physical presence", although the ruling was later overturned by a Court of Appeal before the child could be killed.<ref>[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-forced-abortion-ruling-22-week-old-unborn-baby-not-a-physical-presence UK forced abortion ruling: 22-week-old unborn baby ‘not a physical presence’]</ref>

In July 2019, a UK court ordered an abortion to be forced on a 22-week pregnant mother that was mentally disabled.  Madame Justice Nathalie Lieven deemed the 22-week old fetus as "not a physical presence", although the ruling was later overturned by a Court of Appeal before the child could be killed.<ref>[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-forced-abortion-ruling-22-week-old-unborn-baby-not-a-physical-presence UK forced abortion ruling: 22-week-old unborn baby ‘not a physical presence’]</ref>