1,410
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 117:
Line 117: + + + +
Your reversion of my edit
I know that the Fairness doctrine still isn't in effect. I just forgot to put that in the article. This is why wikis are so great. Other people can augment the articles to make them better. Thanks for your help on the article. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 18:35, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
I know that the Fairness doctrine still isn't in effect. I just forgot to put that in the article. This is why wikis are so great. Other people can augment the articles to make them better. Thanks for your help on the article. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 18:35, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
== Your reversion of my edit ==
Hello, I do disagree that accuracy trumps preferred euphemisms. Specifically, I am referring to your revert [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anti-Flag&diff=164836&oldid=164792 here]. Could you point me to a policy that says "Courtesy calls for using the names factions prefer to use themselves." Thanks. [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 23:04, 16 May 2007 (EDT)