nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
no edit summary
:That is a good point. But this article is rather soft on what seems to be a liberal political activists group. E.g., adopting the liberial preferred "pro-choice." [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 00:29, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
:That is a good point. But this article is rather soft on what seems to be a liberal political activists group. E.g., adopting the liberial preferred "pro-choice." [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 00:29, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
::That minor issue is being discussed on Aschlafly's talk page. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:30, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
::That minor issue is being discussed on Aschlafly's talk page. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:30, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
The site appears to be written by a fan, and has a POV in that manner. I agree, Heartofgold, that it does need a rewrite. This reminds me of when a Yankees fan wrote [[New York Yankees]] in a tone with such excessive praise that we ended up removing most of what he wrote. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:31, 17 May 2007 (EDT)