Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + +
→Unemployment statistics wrong
::I find it hard to believe that a liberal governement like this one would have such low unemployment - must be a mistake. Delete maybe? [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 08:16, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
::I find it hard to believe that a liberal governement like this one would have such low unemployment - must be a mistake. Delete maybe? [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 08:16, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
::: [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/nz.html Here]]. No ideological deletes, especially when so ill-informed. 3.8% in 2006 as a whole. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter Liaise with the cabal?]</sup>
::: [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/nz.html Here]]. No ideological deletes, especially when so ill-informed. 3.8% in 2006 as a whole. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter Liaise with the cabal?]</sup>
: That's very different from the number reported in the content page. Could that be due to how unemployment is measured in New Zealand? E.g., are many people simply dropped off the rolls after 6 months, even though they continue to be unemployed?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 17 May 2007 (EDT)