Changes

{{quotebox|“Rachel Maddow’s success was a one-trick pony. That trick was Trump-Russia conspiracy theories on an [[Alex Jones]] level of crazy. After the Mueller report, Maddow’s decline was inevitable. She got a respite due to [[impeachment sham|impeachment hysteria]], but now that that too has passed, there’s no reason for anyone except the [[far left|hardcore left]] to watch her. Her decline could be permanent unless some other political paranoid delusion draws people back to her.”<ref>https://thepoliticalinsider.com/rachel-maddows-ratings-continue-to-tank-at-msnbc/</ref>}}

{{quotebox|“Rachel Maddow’s success was a one-trick pony. That trick was Trump-Russia conspiracy theories on an [[Alex Jones]] level of crazy. After the Mueller report, Maddow’s decline was inevitable. She got a respite due to [[impeachment sham|impeachment hysteria]], but now that that too has passed, there’s no reason for anyone except the [[far left|hardcore left]] to watch her. Her decline could be permanent unless some other political paranoid delusion draws people back to her.”<ref>https://thepoliticalinsider.com/rachel-maddows-ratings-continue-to-tank-at-msnbc/</ref>}}

[[Media Research Center]] Vice President Dan Gainor also told [[Fox News]],  

[[Media Research Center]] Vice President Dan Gainor also told [[Fox News]],  

{{quotebox|“I think this is a battle of extreme idiocy and that favors [[CNN]]. Maddow has two strikes against her — she tends to be wonky and she lost a lot of [[leftist]] support when she was massively wrong about Russia. Even the left has the standard of wanting their pundits not to make them look bad.}}

{{quotebox|“I think this is a battle of extreme idiocy and that favors [[CNN]]. Maddow has two strikes against her — she tends to be wonky and she lost a lot of [[leftist]] support when she was massively wrong about Russia. Even the left has the standard of wanting their pundits not to make them look bad."}}

==Advertisers==

==Advertisers==