| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
| | * It was not a 'typical' trial | | * It was not a 'typical' trial |
| | * The judge did not copy 90% of the ACLU's brief | | * The judge did not copy 90% of the ACLU's brief |
| − | * The judge did not award over $2m in fees; the actual figure was $1m | + | * <s>The judge did not award over $2m in fees; the actual figure was $1m</s> |
| − | * It was the school board itself, not its members, who were liable to pay the $1m | + | * It was the school board itself, not its members, who were liable to pay the <s>$1m</s> fees |
| | * The judge did not prohibit mention of ID by teachers in the school | | * The judge did not prohibit mention of ID by teachers in the school |
| | * The judge's order did not prevent appeal - how on earth ''could'' it? | | * The judge's order did not prevent appeal - how on earth ''could'' it? |
| Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| | | | |
| | :Tsumetai, would you like me to post the order granting over $2m in legal fees? Would you believe it then? Would like to see how it was entered against the school board members personally in addition to the board? Would you like to see how the order prevented any appeal? I can obtain the order in pdf format and would be happy to post it if I can figure how ... and if you agree to reconsider your position.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:01, 25 February 2007 (EST) | | :Tsumetai, would you like me to post the order granting over $2m in legal fees? Would you believe it then? Would like to see how it was entered against the school board members personally in addition to the board? Would you like to see how the order prevented any appeal? I can obtain the order in pdf format and would be happy to post it if I can figure how ... and if you agree to reconsider your position.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:01, 25 February 2007 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Actually, you're correct on the amount; I tracked down a copy of the order myself. The reduction to $1M was due to a later agreement between the plaintiffs and the new school board, it seems. The order names only the Dover School District and its board of directors, however. So, I gladly withdraw my complaint about the amount, but I'm still concerned about the other points I raised. For future reference, I'm happy to reconsider any and all positions I hold, given sufficient evidence to the contrary. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:27, 25 February 2007 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | == Plagiarism is unethical == | | == Plagiarism is unethical == |