53
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 185:
Line 185: − +
no edit summary
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:02, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:02, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
It is clearly false to claim "Also, the experts are apparently unanimous that the the creation and flood accounts in Genesis are not allegory." If that were true, then there would be no debate among scholars, which there is... unless your definition of expert is "Those who agree that Genesis is not allegorical.". [[User:QNA|QNA]] 12:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
It is clearly false to claim "Also, the experts are apparently unanimous that the the creation and flood accounts in Genesis are not allegory." If that were true, then there would be no debate among scholars, which there is... unless your definition of expert is "Those who agree that Genesis is not allegorical.". As just an example... here's 10,000+ clergy who might disagree with you: http://www.butler.edu/clergyproject/religion_science_collaboration.htm --- But I'm sure none of them is an "expert". [[User:QNA|QNA]] 12:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)