Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,670
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 266:
Line 266: − +
→Third objection: The rabbinical additions do not have the "marks" of inspired writing: <nowiki>
:See the video talk [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbBzVH2HM_w '''I Don't Recognize Your "Authority"''' - YouTube] —"I have only your word for this. I have no obligation to believe you. What authority do you have to tell me these books are the word of God? I just don't recognize your authority." (See [[Heresy]])
:See the video talk [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbBzVH2HM_w '''I Don't Recognize Your "Authority"''' - YouTube] —"I have only your word for this. I have no obligation to believe you. What authority do you have to tell me these books are the word of God? I just don't recognize your authority." (See [[Heresy]])
:See also [[Cafeteria Christianity]]. First you actually remove, or simply dismiss, as invalid and unreliable, the texts of the Bible supporting the position you dispute, and then you say, "It's not in the Bible." [[Sola Scriptura]]. [[Proof text]]. Then you [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|insist]], "That's not in ''my'' Bible!"
:See also <nowiki>[[Cafeteria Christianity]]</nowiki>. First you actually remove, or simply dismiss, as invalid and unreliable, the texts of the Bible supporting the position you dispute, and then you say, "It's not in the Bible." [[Sola Scriptura]]. [[Proof text]]. Then you [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|insist]], "That's not in ''my'' Bible!"
:
:
It is evident from the facts cited above that those portions of the Book of Daniel called ''The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children, Story of Susanna,'' and ''Bel and the Dragon,'' cannot be evaluated solely on the basis of Jewish rejection, apparent lack of evidence of an original Hebrew text, and ''subjective assessment of content'' according to what ''seems to the reader'' to be marks of inspired writing.
It is evident from the facts cited above that those portions of the Book of Daniel called ''The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children, Story of Susanna,'' and ''Bel and the Dragon,'' cannot be evaluated solely on the basis of Jewish rejection, apparent lack of evidence of an original Hebrew text, and ''subjective assessment of content'' according to what ''seems to the reader'' to be marks of inspired writing.