Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:  
::This is your lucky day Ed! I'd be DELIGHTED to answer her criticism of the Jersey girls, and I have no doubt you'll be just as DELIGHTED to defend those remarks of her's! Let's have at it! My criticism is as follows:
 
::This is your lucky day Ed! I'd be DELIGHTED to answer her criticism of the Jersey girls, and I have no doubt you'll be just as DELIGHTED to defend those remarks of her's! Let's have at it! My criticism is as follows:
   −
::Ann Coulter is in absolutely no position, and has absolutely no business announcing in a book that some of the women widowed by 9/11 are "enjoying" their husbands deaths. She has even less business referring to them as "harpies" and saying that they had better hurry up and pose for PLAYBOY and speculating that their husbands may have wanted to divorce them anyway. There is absolutely no context in which such remoarks would be appropriate.
+
::Ann Coulter is in absolutely no position, and has absolutely no business announcing in a book that some of the women widowed by 9/11 are "enjoying" their husbands deaths. She has even less business referring to them as "harpies" and saying that they had better hurry up and pose for PLAYBOY and speculating that their husbands may have wanted to divorce them anyway. There is absolutely no context in which such remarks would be appropriate.
    
::Plainly you disagree with this criticism of mine. Let's hear your arguments.
 
::Plainly you disagree with this criticism of mine. Let's hear your arguments.
    
::Look forward to seeing them. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:04, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::Look forward to seeing them. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:04, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
679

edits

Navigation menu