Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,469
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + + + + +
→Hmmm
I guess one can only conclude, taking all Paul's writings together, that the Spirit of Christ existed before Jesus was born. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 17:17, 2 July 2020 (EDT)
I guess one can only conclude, taking all Paul's writings together, that the Spirit of Christ existed before Jesus was born. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 17:17, 2 July 2020 (EDT)
==Amazing==
For all spam and garbage on this page about Roman Catholicism vs. Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism vs Protestantism, there is nothing, NOTHING - about Holy Spirit baptism 0 which is what the New Testament teaches.
Instead, it opens with the ludicrous idea that a "formal doctrine of the Holy Spirit" wasn't development until 3oo years after Jesus Christ, cause apparently Jesus and the New Testament writers were too stupid to communicate what they meant when they wrote and spoke of the Holy Spirit and Holy Spirit baptism.
Dataclarifier's contributions here I personally would classify as "doubtful disputations" and recommend be to excised and moved to Essay space, unless Satan or God or whoever he owes allegiance to motivates him to come here and defend this deceptive nonsense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 18:54, 2 July 2020 (EDT)