Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,716
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1,269:
Line 1,269: − +
→Rob Smith, still waiting for you to summarize 3 or 4 essential beliefs of the Gospel in one para: clarif.
I think the chief Catholic doctrinal source of philosophy, Aristotle, calls that an AMPHIBOLY, a rhetorical device used to perpetrate fallacies.
I think the chief Catholic doctrinal source of philosophy, Aristotle, calls that an AMPHIBOLY, a rhetorical device used to perpetrate fallacies.
I have a second question. Do you think expressing a doctrine about PROPITIATION with an AMPHIBOLY is a PROPITIOUS way to set the ground rules of what is conveyed to be a collegial discussion? Or is it more like you placing something slippery in front of a colleague who's walking with you and sincerely seeking understanding to add to his faith?
I have a second question. Do you think expressing a doctrine about PROPITIATION with an AMPHIBOLY is a PROPITIOUS way to set the ground rules (presumably what you refered to as an ESSENTIAL belief) of what is conveyed to be a collegial discussion? Or is it more like you placing something slippery in front of a colleague who's walking with you and sincerely seeking understanding to add to his faith?
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Monday, 14:27, 13 July 2020 (EDT)
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Monday, 14:27, 13 July 2020 (EDT)