Changes

In terms of political perspective it is similar to [[Snopes]].

In terms of political perspective it is similar to [[Snopes]].

Most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate. For instance, [[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]] (see [[Conservapedia Derangement Syndrome]]). Conservapedia is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news." They claim that it, "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref>

Most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate. For instance, [[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]] (see [[Conservapedia Derangement Syndrome]]). Conservapedia is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news." They claim that it, "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref> Its page on Creation Ministries International gets almost everything wrong, with only three sentences being completely free of error and every other sentence being completely free of fact, even initially getting the organization's name wrong. It frivolously and fraudulently accuses CMI of having "conspiracy' and "pseudoscience" even though nothing that CMI does would qualify for the definition of either of the two words.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-ministries-international/</ref> Contrary to capitalization rules regarding proper names, Media Bias Fact Check has refused to capitalize the word "[[Bible]]" in at least one of its review pages.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-apologetics-research-ministry-carm/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check also considers [[Breitbart News]] as "extreme" and positioned on the "[[far-right]]" of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check also considers [[Breitbart News]] as "extreme" and positioned on the "[[far-right]]" of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check demonstrates their double standard and hypocrisy by defending [[liberal]] [[establishment]] echo chamber [[Wikipedia]] as, "Least Biased,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/</ref> and leftist atheist crackpot operation RationalWiki repeatedly as "pro-science," while simultaneously calling Conservapedia, "right-wing Christian propaganda."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check demonstrates their double standard and hypocrisy by defending [[liberal]] [[establishment]] echo chamber [[Wikipedia]] as, "Least Biased,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/</ref> and leftist atheist crackpot operation RationalWiki repeatedly as "pro-science," while simultaneously calling Conservapedia, "right-wing Christian propaganda."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/</ref>

[[Conservative]]s have criticized the liberal "fact-checking" website for being subjective and often outright false.<ref>https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/10/can-you-trust-what-media-biasfact-check.html</ref><ref>https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/</ref><ref>https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/</ref> On their "10 Best Fact Checking Sites," they list several objectively false and generally inaccurate left-wing "fact-checkers," including [[PolitiFact]], [[Snopes]], and the Fact Checker by the [[Washington Post]].<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2016/07/20/the-10-best-fact-checking-sites/</ref>

[[Conservative]]s have criticized the liberal "fact-checking" website for being subjective and often outright false.<ref>https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/10/can-you-trust-what-media-biasfact-check.html</ref><ref>https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/</ref><ref>https://www.wnd.com/2017/02/phony-baloney-the-9-fakest-fake-news-checkers/</ref> On their "10 Best Fact Checking Sites," they list several objectively false and generally inaccurate left-wing "fact-checkers," including [[PolitiFact]], [[Snopes]], and the Fact Checker by the [[Washington Post]].<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2016/07/20/the-10-best-fact-checking-sites/</ref>

==External Links==

==External Links==