Changes

In terms of political perspective it is similar to [[Snopes]], and most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate.

In terms of political perspective it is similar to [[Snopes]], and most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate.

[[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]]. Conservapedia is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news." They claim that it, "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref> Its page on Creation Ministries International gets almost everything wrong, with only three sentences being completely free of error and every other sentence being completely free of fact, even initially getting the organization's name wrong. It frivolously and fraudulently accuses CMI of having "conspiracy' and "pseudoscience" even though nothing that CMI does would qualify for the definition of either of the two words.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-ministries-international/</ref> Contrary to capitalization rules regarding proper names, Media Bias Fact Check has refused to capitalize the word "[[Bible]]" in at least one of its review pages.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-apologetics-research-ministry-carm/</ref>

[[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]]; it is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news," and that it "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref> Its page on Creation Ministries International is almost entirely incorrect, with only three sentences being free of error, and in one instance it spells the organization's name wrong. It frivolously and fraudulently accuses CMI of having "conspiracy' and "pseudoscience" even though nothing that CMI does would qualify for the definition of either of the two words.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-ministries-international/</ref> Contrary to capitalization rules regarding proper names, Media Bias Fact Check has refused to capitalize the word "[[Bible]]" in at least one of its review pages.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-apologetics-research-ministry-carm/</ref> Prager University is considered "propaganda,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/</ref> and [[the Rebel Media|Rebel News]] is considered "biased based on story selection that always favours the right."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-rebel/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check also considers [[Breitbart News]] as "extreme" and positioned on the "[[far-right]]" of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check considers [[Breitbart News]] as "extreme" and positioned on the "[[far-right]]" of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>

Media Bias Fact Check demonstrates its double standard and hypocrisy by defending [[progressive]] echo chamber [[Wikipedia]] as, "Least Biased,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/</ref> and leftist atheist crackpot operation RationalWiki repeatedly as "pro-science," while simultaneously calling Conservapedia, "right-wing Christian propaganda."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/</ref>

 

Media Bias Fact Check demonstrates their double standard and hypocrisy by defending [[liberal]] [[establishment]] echo chamber [[Wikipedia]] as, "Least Biased,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/</ref> and leftist atheist crackpot operation RationalWiki repeatedly as "pro-science," while simultaneously calling Conservapedia, "right-wing Christian propaganda."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/</ref>

==Criticism==

==Criticism==