Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,085
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + + + +
Talk:Debate: Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical? (view source)
Revision as of 16:06, August 24, 2020
, 16:06, August 24, 2020→Phony scholarship and phony authority
*''ye are not under law, but under grace''
*''ye are not under law, but under grace''
A cosmetic appeal to look "authoritive" while adding no narrative context or substance to the discussion, is not articulating the position of the Roman Catholic church on grace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 09:19, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
A cosmetic appeal to look "authoritive" while adding no narrative context or substance to the discussion, is not articulating the position of the Roman Catholic church on grace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 09:19, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
:Bottomline, and this comment should rightly go into the Debate mainspace, if Christian believers are not under law as the Bible says, but rather under grace, the Roman Catholic church then has no legal authority.
:The Roman Catholic church's claims to "authority" can only be enforced by law. The Christian believer is not under law. Hence the Catholic catechism's convoluted claims that ultimately deny scripture and arrive at the conclusion that ''grace is not grace''. This is the basis by which the Roman Catholic church can claim to have authority. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 12:06, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
==Template design==
==Template design==