Changes

::::::::Still riding your Matthew 16:18 hobby horse? You're spinning your wheels. You need to begin defending where catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture to gain any traction. You're just spamming re-cycled junk you already posted in the Magisterium and Authority Forever debates and elsewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 13:17, 25 August 2020 (EDT)

::::::::Still riding your Matthew 16:18 hobby horse? You're spinning your wheels. You need to begin defending where catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture to gain any traction. You're just spamming re-cycled junk you already posted in the Magisterium and Authority Forever debates and elsewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 13:17, 25 August 2020 (EDT)

:::::::::It's the Word of God. The ''Catechism'' cites scripture as the root of Catholic doctrine, so there is no conflict or nullification of scripture in the Catechism. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:24, 25 August 2020 (EDT)<br>Your position is the [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|fallacy of assertion]] against the evidence. You say the catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture. It's not true. Your position is maintained by persistent [[confirmation bias]] in spite of the evidence that what you say is simply not true—frankly a position resting on a [[falsehood]]. It's an example of the [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] and [[Willful ignorance]] which was exhibited by all of the Protestant Reformers in their debates with Catholic theologians who cited scripture. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:34, 25 August 2020 (EDT)

:::::::::It's the Word of God. The ''Catechism'' cites scripture as the root of Catholic doctrine, so there is no conflict or nullification of scripture in the Catechism. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:24, 25 August 2020 (EDT)<br>Your position is the [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|fallacy of assertion]] against the evidence. You say the catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture. It's not true. Your position is maintained by persistent [[confirmation bias]] in spite of the evidence that what you say is simply not true—frankly a position resting on a [[falsehood]]. It's an example of the [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] and [[Willful ignorance]] which was exhibited by all of the Protestant Reformers in their debates with Catholic theologians who cited scripture. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:34, 25 August 2020 (EDT)<br>The Catholic doctrine of grace is biblical. The authority of the Catholic Church to teach that doctrine is biblical. The ''Catechism of the Catholic Church'' is proof, based on scripture. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:50, 25 August 2020 (EDT)

==Refs==

==Refs==