Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,396
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 218:
Line 218: + +
Talk:Debate: Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical? (view source)
Revision as of 18:01, August 25, 2020
, 18:01, August 25, 2020→Debate: Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical
:::::::::::The question was and is ably answered by Tim Staples' article, linked and posted on this page. Either you didn't read it, or you have decided to ignore it and simply say falsely ([[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|fallacy of assertion]]) that the question has not been answered. It has been fully answered. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:59, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
:::::::::::The question was and is ably answered by Tim Staples' article, linked and posted on this page. Either you didn't read it, or you have decided to ignore it and simply say falsely ([[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|fallacy of assertion]]) that the question has not been answered. It has been fully answered. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:59, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
::::::::::::You're "overwhelming weight" and "linguistic" arguments do not cut it. ''God is not the author of confusion''. The Catechism does not "add to" or replace the Bible. Your spam is nothing but confusion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 14:01, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
==Refs==
==Refs==