SkipCaptcha
951
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 167:
Line 167: − +
User talk:IndependentSkeptic (view source)
Revision as of 21:36, August 30, 2020
, 21:36, August 30, 2020→The problem
:::Not it doesn't. You have no clue ''who'' authored that catechism anymore than ''who'' authors Wikipedia. And it was not ''God-breathed'' nor ''holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup>
:::Not it doesn't. You have no clue ''who'' authored that catechism anymore than ''who'' authors Wikipedia. And it was not ''God-breathed'' nor ''holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup>
:::Incidentally, being that Solomon authored Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticle of Canticles, despite his ''heart was not perfect with the LORD his God'' in his old age, he still qualifies as one of the ''holy men of God'', which would tend to argue in favor of [[Eternal security (salvation)|eternal security]]. Not so? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 17:24, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
:::Incidentally, being that Solomon authored Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticle of Canticles, despite his ''heart was not perfect with the LORD his God'' in his old age, he still qualifies as one of the ''holy men of God'', which would tend to argue in favor of [[Eternal security (salvation)|eternal security]]. Not so? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 17:24, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
::::So, you'll even reject the scriptures cited as clear proofs that anybody can read for themselves that anonymous preachers of the church cite as infallible proofs of support for Catholic doctrines. The doctrines are rooted firmly in the inspired word of God. You just refuse to accept it. You are not even as honest as the Beroeans who checked these things for themselves to see if they are true. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 17:35, 30 August 2020 (EDT)
::::So, you'll even reject the scriptures cited as clear proofs that anybody can read for themselves that anonymous preachers of the church cite as infallible proofs of support for Catholic doctrines. The doctrines are rooted firmly in the inspired word of God. You just refuse to accept it. You are not even as honest as the Beroeans who checked these things for themselves to see if they are true, what Paul said in his preaching. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 17:35, 30 August 2020 (EDT)