Changes

* Orwell believed that although socialism is good as an ideal, it can never be successfully adopted due to uncontrollable sins of human nature. [http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/articles/col-afcp.htm]

* Orwell believed that although socialism is good as an ideal, it can never be successfully adopted due to uncontrollable sins of human nature. [http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/articles/col-afcp.htm]

Let's put more about liberal revisionism into this article. [[Walter Cronkite]]'s introduction to ''198411 (assuming there was no ghostwriter) is a case in point. He succeeds in drawing the reader's attention completely away from Communist countries and hammers home the point that ''1984'' is nothing but a warning to the West. He should have said that the Soviet Union itself is a warning to the West.  

Let's put more about liberal revisionism into this article. [[Walter Cronkite]]'s introduction to ''1984'' (assuming there was no ghostwriter) is a case in point. He succeeds in drawing the reader's attention completely away from Communist countries and hammers home the point that ''1984'' is nothing but a warning to the West. He should have said that the Soviet Union itself is a warning to the West.  

But Communist propaganda has been so successful that people to this day think that Hitler was the epitome of murderous tyrants. They ignore Stalin and Mao who were ten times worse, and don't even know they are igoring them. '''This is precisely the point of ''1984''!''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 16:21, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

But Communist propaganda has been so successful that people to this day think that Hitler was the epitome of murderous tyrants. They ignore Stalin and Mao who were ten times worse, and don't even know they are igoring them. '''This is precisely the point of ''1984''!''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 16:21, 16 August 2011 (EDT)