SkipCaptcha
951
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 225:
Line 225: − +
User talk:IndependentSkeptic (view source)
Revision as of 23:10, August 31, 2020
, 23:10, August 31, 2020→Interesting suggestion
::::::::"Largest contributor currently". Andy Schlafly gives him a free hand to violate Conservapedia. I can only conclude that Andy fully approves of his incivility and grants him complete immunity to express his bigotry. Why does he put up with it? Again, obvious [[Double standard]]. It's unconscionable. It's neither Catholic nor Christian nor ethical. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 18:56, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
::::::::"Largest contributor currently". Andy Schlafly gives him a free hand to violate Conservapedia. I can only conclude that Andy fully approves of his incivility and grants him complete immunity to express his bigotry. Why does he put up with it? Again, obvious [[Double standard]]. It's unconscionable. It's neither Catholic nor Christian nor ethical. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 18:56, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
::::::::Conservative has also refused to discipline or restrain either of them [RobSmith and VargasMilan]. Same thing. Several Debate pages about controversies over Catholic doctrines are proof. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 19:04, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
::::::::'''User: Conservative''' has also refused to discipline or restrain either of them [RobSmith and VargasMilan]. Same thing. Several Debate pages about controversies over Catholic doctrines are proof. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 19:04, 31 August 2020 (EDT)