| Line 134: |
Line 134: |
| | | | |
| | ===CDC projections=== | | ===CDC projections=== |
| − | [[File:Projected deaths.PNG |right|350px|thumb|Projected deaths. ''Source:'' www.healthdata.org/<ref>http://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/research_articles/2020/COVID-forecasting-03252020_4.pdf</ref>]]
| + | |
| | The CDC modeled four scenarios of the spread of the disease in a presentation in February 2020. The worst case was 1.7 million deaths. The best was 200,000. Other infectious disease experts weren't as optimistic: | | The CDC modeled four scenarios of the spread of the disease in a presentation in February 2020. The worst case was 1.7 million deaths. The best was 200,000. Other infectious disease experts weren't as optimistic: |
| | | | |
| Line 140: |
Line 140: |
| | | | |
| | :Dr. Lawler’s calculations suggested 480,000 deaths, which he said was conservative. By contrast, about 20,000 to 50,000 people have died from flu-related illnesses this season, according to the C.D.C. Unlike with seasonal influenza, the entire population is thought to be susceptible to the new coronavirus.<ref>http://archive.is/QzLH5</ref> | | :Dr. Lawler’s calculations suggested 480,000 deaths, which he said was conservative. By contrast, about 20,000 to 50,000 people have died from flu-related illnesses this season, according to the C.D.C. Unlike with seasonal influenza, the entire population is thought to be susceptible to the new coronavirus.<ref>http://archive.is/QzLH5</ref> |
| − | | + | [[File:Projected deaths.PNG |right|350px|thumb|Projected deaths. ''Source:'' www.healthdata.org/<ref>http://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/research_articles/2020/COVID-forecasting-03252020_4.pdf</ref>]] |
| | '''IHME projections - [[Gates Foundation]]''' | | '''IHME projections - [[Gates Foundation]]''' |
| | | | |
| Line 148: |
Line 148: |
| | | | |
| | ===Response=== | | ===Response=== |
| − | [[File:Biden WuFlu.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Democrat presidential nominee [[Joe Biden]] takes to the airwaves to counter official White House/CDC press briefings. Biden and Trump critics alleged President Trump does not heed the advice of scientists and experts.]]
| + | |
| | In the United States, fake news panic-mongers expected a top-down command-and-control response with [[big government]] dictating testing and standards. Rather than duplicate the effort under a federal bureaucracy that was unprepared, ill-equipped and would take months or years to service a nation of 327 million people, the [[Trump administration]] moved quickly to engage existing [[private sector]] laboratories, medical personnel, and suppliers to confront the crisis. | | In the United States, fake news panic-mongers expected a top-down command-and-control response with [[big government]] dictating testing and standards. Rather than duplicate the effort under a federal bureaucracy that was unprepared, ill-equipped and would take months or years to service a nation of 327 million people, the [[Trump administration]] moved quickly to engage existing [[private sector]] laboratories, medical personnel, and suppliers to confront the crisis. |
| | | | |
| Line 304: |
Line 304: |
| | In violation of Article I, Sec 10 (paragraph 3) of the [[U.S. Constitution]] which reads: | | In violation of Article I, Sec 10 (paragraph 3) of the [[U.S. Constitution]] which reads: |
| | {{Cquote|<big>''No state shall, without the consent of Congress, … enter into any agreement or compact with another state,''</big>}} | | {{Cquote|<big>''No state shall, without the consent of Congress, … enter into any agreement or compact with another state,''</big>}} |
| | + | [[File:Biden WuFlu.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Democrat presidential nominee [[Joe Biden]] takes to the airwaves to counter official White House/CDC press briefings. Biden and Trump critics alleged President Trump does not heed the advice of scientists and experts.]] |
| | Democrat governors of New York (Cuomo), New Jersey (Murphy), Connecticut (Lamont), Pennsylvania (Wolfe), Delaware (Carney) and Rhode Island (Raimondo) [[collude]]d together to keep the northeast region of the U.S. shut down. Controlling critical ports and infrastructure was a key part of their plan.<ref>https://qns.com/story/2020/04/13/task-force-between-six-states-will-deliberate-on-how-to-open-economy-again/</ref> On the West Coast, the governors of California (Newsom), Oregon (Brown) and Washington State (Inslee) also assembled an economic war council. Together with their political northeastern allies, controlling two-thirds of U.S. ports gives them a strategic advantage to keep choking the U.S. economy until a Democrat [[commander-in-chief]] can be installed in the [[White House]].<ref>https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/492562-west-coast-governors-announce-joint-plan-for-reopening-economies</ref> ''[[Bloomberg News]]'' published an op-ed on April 9, 2020 by Francis Wilkinson entitled, ''Gavin Newsom Declares California a ‘Nation-State’'': | | Democrat governors of New York (Cuomo), New Jersey (Murphy), Connecticut (Lamont), Pennsylvania (Wolfe), Delaware (Carney) and Rhode Island (Raimondo) [[collude]]d together to keep the northeast region of the U.S. shut down. Controlling critical ports and infrastructure was a key part of their plan.<ref>https://qns.com/story/2020/04/13/task-force-between-six-states-will-deliberate-on-how-to-open-economy-again/</ref> On the West Coast, the governors of California (Newsom), Oregon (Brown) and Washington State (Inslee) also assembled an economic war council. Together with their political northeastern allies, controlling two-thirds of U.S. ports gives them a strategic advantage to keep choking the U.S. economy until a Democrat [[commander-in-chief]] can be installed in the [[White House]].<ref>https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/492562-west-coast-governors-announce-joint-plan-for-reopening-economies</ref> ''[[Bloomberg News]]'' published an op-ed on April 9, 2020 by Francis Wilkinson entitled, ''Gavin Newsom Declares California a ‘Nation-State’'': |
| | {{quotebox|California this week declared its independence from the federal government’s feeble efforts to fight Covid-19 — and perhaps from a bit more. The consequences for the fight against the pandemic are almost certainly positive. The implications for the brewing civil war between Trumpism and America’s budding 21st-century majority, embodied by California’s multiracial liberal electorate, are less clear. | | {{quotebox|California this week declared its independence from the federal government’s feeble efforts to fight Covid-19 — and perhaps from a bit more. The consequences for the fight against the pandemic are almost certainly positive. The implications for the brewing civil war between Trumpism and America’s budding 21st-century majority, embodied by California’s multiracial liberal electorate, are less clear. |