Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 57:
Line 57: + + + +
→Sysop warning: Should all users be equal here?
::''Sysop's and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. Failure to do so will result in the user being blocked.''
::''Sysop's and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. Failure to do so will result in the user being blocked.''
:Note: ''Their <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysops]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> instructions, as to Conservapedia policy [...] are to be followed'', which means if a sysop has decided it is so it is so. If you argue you get blocked. [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 08:09, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
:Note: ''Their <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysops]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> instructions, as to Conservapedia policy [...] are to be followed'', which means if a sysop has decided it is so it is so. If you argue you get blocked. [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 08:09, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
*No need for sarcasm, Auld Nick. It's simply rude to label another person as "rude". In one etiquette book I read, it is considered the height of rudeness to do this.
*The exception is parents teaching their children, or anyone else have authority to teach and enforce a standard.
*The idea that "we are all equals here" is anarchic nonsense which even Wikipedia does not tolerate. If you disagree with this, perhaps you should start a discussion about ethics as one of our [[Debate topics]]. How about: [[Conservapedia:Should all users be equal here?]] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:15, 19 May 2007 (EDT)