Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + + + +
Not so shiny
:This article seems to be a shining example the kind of concise article Conservapedia wants. At [[Conservapedia:Differences with Wikipedia]] (4.) it is clearly mentioned that ''We encourage conciseness here, like a true encyclopedia. Wikipedia implicitly encourages (through its use of stubs) long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential facts.''
:This article seems to be a shining example the kind of concise article Conservapedia wants. At [[Conservapedia:Differences with Wikipedia]] (4.) it is clearly mentioned that ''We encourage conciseness here, like a true encyclopedia. Wikipedia implicitly encourages (through its use of stubs) long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential facts.''
:[[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 08:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 08:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
Not so shiny. It merely likens Flemish to Dutch and says it's spoken in Belgium. I vote for a merge and redirect:
*[[Belgium]] because it's spoken there; or,
*[[List of European languages]] or [[Languages of Europe]] - a proposed article on the languages of Europe. This would be especially useful for countries which don't have a national language. I assume they speak Polish in Poland, and French in France, but where is German spoken? In Austria as well as in Germany?
There's "concise", and there's also "too short to be of any real use". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:36, 19 May 2007 (EDT)