Block, SkipCaptcha
397
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − [[Conservapedia]] is placed at the very end of the [[right-wing]] of the [[political spectrum]]; it is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status." It is accused of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news," and that it "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref> Its page on Creation Ministries International is almost entirely incorrect, with only three sentences being free of error, and in one instance it spells the organization's name wrong. It frivolously and fraudulently accuses CMI of having "conspiracy' and "pseudoscience" even though nothing that CMI does would qualify for the definition of either of the two words.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-ministries-international/</ref> Contrary to capitalization rules regarding proper names, Media Bias Fact Check has refused to capitalize the word "[[Bible]]" in at least one of its review pages.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-apologetics-research-ministry-carm/</ref> Prager University is considered "propaganda,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/</ref> and [[the Rebel Media|Rebel News]] is considered "biased based on story selection that always favours the right."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-rebel/</ref>+ − + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Media Bias Fact Check (view source)
Revision as of 20:33, September 4, 2020
, 20:33, September 4, 2020→Political bias
In terms of political perspective it is similar to [[Snopes]], and most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate.
In terms of political perspective it is similar to [[Snopes]], and most of Media Bias Fact Check's assessments are wildly inaccurate.
===Conservapedia===
Media Bias Fact Check considers [[Breitbart News]] as "extreme" and positioned on the "[[far-right]]" of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> The [[globalist]] [[Fox News Channel]] is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and even the [[neoconservative]] [[Wall Street Journal]], which has accused YouTuber [[PewDiePie]] of being an [[anti-Semite]],<ref>https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533</ref> is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>
It places [[Conservapedia]] at the very end of the [[right-wing]] - or "extreme right" - of the [[political spectrum]]; it is listed under "Questionable Sources" and described as "border[ing] on hate group status" due to its "consistent negative reporting on 'LGBTQ,' Climate Change, Racism, Border Security and people of color..." even though Conservapedia condemns racism on its website.<ref>https://conservapedia.com/Racism</ref> Media Bias Fact Check accuses Conservapedia of promoting "conspiracies" and "fake news". Media Bias Fact Check claims that it "is not a credible source on any level or by any known criteria" without providing evidence to support this claim.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/</ref>
===Creation Ministries International===
Its page on Creation Ministries International is almost entirely incorrect, with only three sentences being free of error, and in one instance it spells the organization's name wrong. It frivolously and fraudulently accuses CMI of having "conspiracy" and "pseudoscience," although nothing that CMI does would qualify for the definition of either of these words.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-ministries-international/</ref>
===Others===
Prager University is considered "propaganda,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/</ref> and [[the Rebel Media|Rebel News]] is considered "biased based on story selection that always favours the right."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-rebel/</ref>
Media Bias Fact Check considers [[Breitbart News]] as "extreme" and positioned on the "[[far-right]]" of the political spectrum.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/</ref> [[Fox News Channel]] - which is center to left of center in its online content - is considered strongly right-wing biased and disreputable,<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/</ref> and the [[neoconservative]] newspaper ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' is considered very biased to the right.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/</ref>
Contrary to capitalization rules regarding proper names, Media Bias Fact Check has refused to capitalize the word "[[Bible]]" in at least one of its review pages.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-apologetics-research-ministry-carm/</ref>
Media Bias Fact Check demonstrates its double standard and hypocrisy by defending [[progressive]] echo chamber [[Wikipedia]] as "Least Biased,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/</ref> and leftist atheist crackpot operation RationalWiki repeatedly as "pro-science," while simultaneously calling Conservapedia, "right-wing Christian propaganda."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/</ref> It states that "Christianity is a set of dogmatic beliefs, which is opposed to Science which is a method that strictly avoids dogma" in its [[Christian Science]] article.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-science/</ref>
Media Bias Fact Check demonstrates its double standard and hypocrisy by defending [[progressive]] echo chamber [[Wikipedia]] as "Least Biased,"<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/</ref> and leftist atheist crackpot operation RationalWiki repeatedly as "pro-science," while simultaneously calling Conservapedia, "right-wing Christian propaganda."<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/</ref> It states that "Christianity is a set of dogmatic beliefs, which is opposed to Science which is a method that strictly avoids dogma" in its [[Christian Science]] article.<ref>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-science/</ref>