nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + +
Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks (view source)
Revision as of 21:34, May 19, 2007
, 21:34, May 19, 2007→More than two warnings, a user may be blocked as appropriate to the violation.
I'm sorry to be pedantic here, and I would correct this myself, but as it has all been reviewed and checked and approved by everybody and everything I'm reluctant to touch it. The thing is that the above quote isn't, grammatically speaking, a sentence. It's not as bad as the ''"Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block only for ideological reasons."'', as this one more-or-less makes sense. But, still, it should be correctly written if it's part of the rules shouldn't it? --[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 14:59, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
I'm sorry to be pedantic here, and I would correct this myself, but as it has all been reviewed and checked and approved by everybody and everything I'm reluctant to touch it. The thing is that the above quote isn't, grammatically speaking, a sentence. It's not as bad as the ''"Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block only for ideological reasons."'', as this one more-or-less makes sense. But, still, it should be correctly written if it's part of the rules shouldn't it? --[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 14:59, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
*One cannot, in all cases, make specific those things which come from subjective judgements, eh? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 17:34, 19 May 2007 (EDT)