Changes

This was the decision that prompted President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]]'s ill-fated [[court packing]] scheme:

This was the decision that prompted President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]]'s ill-fated [[court packing]] scheme:

{{cquote|Roosevelt was particularly upset by the Court’s 1935 decision in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States. The unanimous decision invalidated a key part of the National Industrial Recovery Act, one of the projects passed during FDR's 100-day program in 1933. President Roosevelt did not mince words a week later when he talked to the press. “You see the implications of the decision. That is why I say it is one of the most important decisions ever rendered in this country,” Roosevelt told reporters on May 31, 1935. “We have been relegated to the horse-and-buggy definition of interstate commerce.”<ref>https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/packing-the-supreme-court-explained</ref>}}

{{cquote|Roosevelt was particularly upset by the Court’s 1935 decision in ''Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States''. The unanimous decision invalidated a key part of the National Industrial Recovery Act, one of the projects passed during FDR's 100-day program in 1933. President Roosevelt did not mince words a week later when he talked to the press. “You see the implications of the decision. That is why I say it is one of the most important decisions ever rendered in this country,” Roosevelt told reporters on May 31, 1935. “We have been relegated to the horse-and-buggy definition of interstate commerce.”<ref>https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/packing-the-supreme-court-explained</ref>}}

== Sources ==

== Sources ==