Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
111 bytes removed ,  22:49, October 4, 2020
no edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:  
Not a single [[pro-life]] or pro-family group endorses Representative Straus. As reported in the news, he was one of twenty-three lawmakers who opposed a bill to block the government order requiring the HPV vaccine for all sixth-grade schoolgirls. He also opposed a bill to ban homosexuals from engaging in foster parenting.<br>
 
Not a single [[pro-life]] or pro-family group endorses Representative Straus. As reported in the news, he was one of twenty-three lawmakers who opposed a bill to block the government order requiring the HPV vaccine for all sixth-grade schoolgirls. He also opposed a bill to ban homosexuals from engaging in foster parenting.<br>
   −
Let me also note that Straus supports statewide gambling and opposes [[school choice]] for parents. Both of these positions are in opposition to our state and national Republican Party platforms. Joe Straus will not advance our conservative cause.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/7805/author=Matt Glazer|title=Former Rep. Nathan Macias's Perspective on Straus|daate=January 15, 2009|publisher=burntorangereport.com|accessdate=February 22, 2014}}</ref></blockquote>
+
Let me also note that Straus supports statewide [[gambling]] and opposes [[school choice]] for parents. Both of these positions are in opposition to our state and national Republican Party platforms. Joe Straus will not advance our conservative cause.<ref>Matt Glazer, "Former Rep. Nathan Macias's Perspective on Straus," Burnt Orange Report, January 15, 2009.</ref></blockquote>
    
===Legislative ratings===
 
===Legislative ratings===
Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
57,799

edits

Navigation menu