387
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: +
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservapedia smears (view source)
Revision as of 16:58, October 5, 2020
, 16:58, October 5, 2020no edit summary
# In discussions at Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View Noticeboard, one editor argued, "You know, conservapedia tends to welcome fringe opinions derived from far-right op-ed statements. You should try there instead."<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_6#Neutral</ref> to which another replied, "The most egregious part, is that editors refuse to find evidence to support their claims and resort to calls for the discussion to stop or for established editors to leave the project and go to conservapedia. This is not helpful."
# In discussions at Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View Noticeboard, one editor argued, "You know, conservapedia tends to welcome fringe opinions derived from far-right op-ed statements. You should try there instead."<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_6#Neutral</ref> to which another replied, "The most egregious part, is that editors refuse to find evidence to support their claims and resort to calls for the discussion to stop or for established editors to leave the project and go to conservapedia. This is not helpful."
# Wikipedia states that 'Various Conservapedia articles contradict established fields of science' which is false.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservapedia&oldid=754613622</ref>
# Wikipedia states that 'Various Conservapedia articles contradict established fields of science' which is false.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservapedia&oldid=754613622</ref>
# Wikipedia also sympathizes with terrorist funder [[Barack Obama]], that is, since he gave money to Hezbollah as President up to $600 million<ref>https://www.independentsentinel.com/obama-funded-terror-group-hezbollah-tune-600-million/</ref>, by saying "Examples of Conservapedia's ideology include its accusations against and strong criticism of former US President Barack Obama, including belief in Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories"<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia</ref> (Note: This bias belongs to the sublists Conservapedia smears and Obama)
== References ==
== References ==