| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | __NEWSECTIONLINK__
| |
| − |
| |
| | == A hangout place for Conservapedia Sysops == | | == A hangout place for Conservapedia Sysops == |
| | | | |
| | (Sysops: please mark this page as watched) | | (Sysops: please mark this page as watched) |
| | | | |
| − | | + | You might wonder who our Sysops are. We have 27 Sysops. Only one of them is related to me, and we often disagree with each other. |
| − | You might wonder who our Sysops are. We have 33 Sysops. Only one of them is related to me, and we often disagree with each other. | |
| | | | |
| | I first met the vast majority of our Sysops online through this website. Except for a few students and one relative, I did not know any of our Sysops before they registered here. Our Sysops reflect all political views, and nearly all time zones. We have several from Britain, several from Australia and at least one from Canada. | | I first met the vast majority of our Sysops online through this website. Except for a few students and one relative, I did not know any of our Sysops before they registered here. Our Sysops reflect all political views, and nearly all time zones. We have several from Britain, several from Australia and at least one from Canada. |
| Line 23: |
Line 20: |
| | | | |
| | On May 17, the Sysop privileges of [[User:Niandra]] were restored. Welcome back, Niandra! That brings our total of unique Sysops to 26.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:41, 17 May 2007 (EDT) | | On May 17, the Sysop privileges of [[User:Niandra]] were restored. Welcome back, Niandra! That brings our total of unique Sysops to 26.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:41, 17 May 2007 (EDT) |
| − |
| |
| − | == User:SirCliff ==
| |
| − | I've blocked this user indefinitely, mainly on the basis of an article that he created titled Membrum Virile and with content claiming that it was an ancient lay Catholic order with some unusual practices. However, all I can find on the topic via Google is that Membrum Virile is a reference to the penis.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | His other [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SirCliff edits] do appear from a quick look to be reasonably accurate if a bit flippant, but I wonder if someone should investigate them a bit closer. Also of some concern is the favourable post about that article that [[user:CatWatcher]] put on SirCliff's [[user talk:SirCliff|talk page]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:13, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : Thanks. I'll investigate further. It's fine to block an account when in doubt, as we can always unblock it further investigation warrants reinstatement.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:55, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | :He has several sockpuppets. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 17:41, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Vulgar metaphors on the page [[Talk:Theory of evolution]] == | | == Vulgar metaphors on the page [[Talk:Theory of evolution]] == |