SkipCaptcha
31
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
Talk:Bostock v. Clayton County (view source)
Revision as of 17:23, October 22, 2020
, 17:23, October 22, 2020no edit summary
I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female.
I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female.
Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be for foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal?
Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be more foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal?