Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:  
In relation to '''atheism and miracles''', modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not [[David Hume]] was an [[atheism|atheist]].<ref>Russell, Paul (Winter 2014).  [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#10 "Hume on religion"].  ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' website, Edward N. Zalta (ed.)  Retrieved on May 24, 2015.</ref>  With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a [[miracle]] is false than that the miracle occurred.<ref>Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"].  ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.:  Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.</ref> Christian apologists [[William Lane Craig]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[C. S. Lewis]], [[JP Holding]], and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.<ref>Multiple references:
 
In relation to '''atheism and miracles''', modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not [[David Hume]] was an [[atheism|atheist]].<ref>Russell, Paul (Winter 2014).  [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#10 "Hume on religion"].  ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' website, Edward N. Zalta (ed.)  Retrieved on May 24, 2015.</ref>  With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a [[miracle]] is false than that the miracle occurred.<ref>Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"].  ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.:  Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.</ref> Christian apologists [[William Lane Craig]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[C. S. Lewis]], [[JP Holding]], and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.<ref>Multiple references:
 
*Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"].  ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.:  Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"].  ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.:  Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
−
*Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1986).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles:  A historical and philosophical perspective"].  ''Gospel Perspectives'', David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (ed.)(Sheffield, England: JSOT press), volume VI, pp. 9-40.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
+
*Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1986).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles:  A historical and philosophical perspective"].  ''Gospel Perspectives'', David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (ed.)(Sheffield, England: JSOT Press), volume VI, pp. 9-40.  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
−
*Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999).  [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03 [Excerpt of&#93; "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principal’ argument against miracles"].  ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', vol. 2, no. 1.  Excerpt retrieved from Galaxie Software Electronic Publishing website on May 24, 2015.
+
*Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999).  [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03 [Excerpt of&#93; "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principle’ argument against miracles"].  ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', vol. 2, no. 1.  Excerpt retrieved from Galaxie Software Electronic Publishing website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Geisler, Dr. Norman (February 2010 or bef.). [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html "Miracles and modern scientific thought"].  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Geisler, Dr. Norman (February 2010 or bef.). [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html "Miracles and modern scientific thought"].  Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.
 
*Lewis, C. S. (1996).  [https://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC ''Miracles''] (New York:  HarperCollins), restored ed.  Retrieved from GoogleBooks archive on May 24, 2015.
 
*Lewis, C. S. (1996).  [https://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC ''Miracles''] (New York:  HarperCollins), restored ed.  Retrieved from GoogleBooks archive on May 24, 2015.
 
*Holding, James Patrick (January 2008 or bef.).  [http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html "David Hume: A critique"].  Tekton Apologetics.  Retrieved on May 24, 2015.
 
*Holding, James Patrick (January 2008 or bef.).  [http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html "David Hume: A critique"].  Tekton Apologetics.  Retrieved on May 24, 2015.
−
*Esposito, Lenny (January 2008 or bef.). [http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp "Is there answer for David Hume on miracles? Are miracles logically impossible?"]  Come Reason Ministries website/Apologetics topics/Philosophical questions.  Retrieved on May 24, 2015.
+
*Esposito, Lenny (January 2008 or bef.). [http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp "Is there an answer for David Hume on miracles? Are miracles logically impossible?"]  Come Reason Ministries website/Apologetics topics/Philosophical questions.  Retrieved on May 24, 2015.
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
  
SkipCaptcha
1,650

edits

Navigation menu