| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | In relation to '''atheism and miracles''', modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not [[David Hume]] was an [[atheism|atheist]].<ref>Russell, Paul (Winter 2014). [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#10 "Hume on religion"]. ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' website, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Retrieved on May 24, 2015.</ref> With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a [[miracle]] is false than that the miracle occurred.<ref>Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998). [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"]. ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.</ref> Christian apologists [[William Lane Craig]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[C. S. Lewis]], [[JP Holding]], and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.<ref>Multiple references: | | In relation to '''atheism and miracles''', modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not [[David Hume]] was an [[atheism|atheist]].<ref>Russell, Paul (Winter 2014). [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#10 "Hume on religion"]. ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' website, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Retrieved on May 24, 2015.</ref> With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a [[miracle]] is false than that the miracle occurred.<ref>Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998). [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"]. ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015.</ref> Christian apologists [[William Lane Craig]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[C. S. Lewis]], [[JP Holding]], and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.<ref>Multiple references: |
| | *Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998). [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"]. ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015. | | *Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1998). [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html "Creation, providence, and miracle"]. ''Philosophy of Religion'', Brian Davies (ed.) (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press), pp. 136-162. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015. |
| − | *Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1986). [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles: A historical and philosophical perspective"]. ''Gospel Perspectives'', David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (ed.)(Sheffield, England: JSOT press), volume VI, pp. 9-40. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015. | + | *Craig, Dr. William Lane, Ph. D. (1986). [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles: A historical and philosophical perspective"]. ''Gospel Perspectives'', David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (ed.)(Sheffield, England: JSOT Press), volume VI, pp. 9-40. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015. |
| − | *Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999). [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03 [Excerpt of] "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principal’ argument against miracles"]. ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', vol. 2, no. 1. Excerpt retrieved from Galaxie Software Electronic Publishing website on May 24, 2015. | + | *Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999). [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03 [Excerpt of] "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principle’ argument against miracles"]. ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', vol. 2, no. 1. Excerpt retrieved from Galaxie Software Electronic Publishing website on May 24, 2015. |
| | *Geisler, Dr. Norman (February 2010 or bef.). [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html "Miracles and modern scientific thought"]. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015. | | *Geisler, Dr. Norman (February 2010 or bef.). [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html "Miracles and modern scientific thought"]. Retrieved from LeaderU archive website on May 24, 2015. |
| | *Lewis, C. S. (1996). [https://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC ''Miracles''] (New York: HarperCollins), restored ed. Retrieved from GoogleBooks archive on May 24, 2015. | | *Lewis, C. S. (1996). [https://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC ''Miracles''] (New York: HarperCollins), restored ed. Retrieved from GoogleBooks archive on May 24, 2015. |
| | *Holding, James Patrick (January 2008 or bef.). [http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html "David Hume: A critique"]. Tekton Apologetics. Retrieved on May 24, 2015. | | *Holding, James Patrick (January 2008 or bef.). [http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html "David Hume: A critique"]. Tekton Apologetics. Retrieved on May 24, 2015. |
| − | *Esposito, Lenny (January 2008 or bef.). [http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp "Is there answer for David Hume on miracles? Are miracles logically impossible?"] Come Reason Ministries website/Apologetics topics/Philosophical questions. Retrieved on May 24, 2015. | + | *Esposito, Lenny (January 2008 or bef.). [http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp "Is there an answer for David Hume on miracles? Are miracles logically impossible?"] Come Reason Ministries website/Apologetics topics/Philosophical questions. Retrieved on May 24, 2015. |
| | </ref> | | </ref> |
| | | | |