84
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 54:
Line 54: + + +
Debate:Is President Bush good for America? (view source)
Revision as of 05:02, May 21, 2007
, 05:02, May 21, 2007no edit summary
: BobD rather wait until Saddam rebuilt his military. Re-acquired WMD, then instead of using them on his own people, he would use them against the USA. Then the USA is justified. Maybe if Saddam came clean instead hiding everything from inspectors. Maybe if Saddam never used WMD in the past. Then Bush was wrong to attack. Your plan sounds like a reputation for disaster.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:21, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
: BobD rather wait until Saddam rebuilt his military. Re-acquired WMD, then instead of using them on his own people, he would use them against the USA. Then the USA is justified. Maybe if Saddam came clean instead hiding everything from inspectors. Maybe if Saddam never used WMD in the past. Then Bush was wrong to attack. Your plan sounds like a reputation for disaster.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:21, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
::The last time Saddam Hussein used military force against a target the US actually cared about, we crushed his military in about a month (the main reason we didn't depose him then was that Bush Senion was a LOT better at foreign policy than his son, and understood that whoever repalced Hussein would probably be WORSE). What makes you think Hussein would think the outcome would be any different in Round 2? Surely not the presence of Weapons, since that would just give the USA an excuse to convert Baghdad into a radioactive parking-lot.
::But, all that is second-guessing the fact is we '''did''' attack, with a third of the troops the military wanted, and no exit plan. That plan also sounds like a recipe for disaster, too, and so far, it has been. --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 01:02, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
I hope people realize that the very reason there are terrorists targeting America is directly because of its foreign policy. Maybe if American foreign policy didn't stick its nose where it didn't belong, we wouldn't have had a tremendous loss in Vietnam, countless nations vehemently loathing us due to the CIA deciding to destabilize them, and another tremendous loss in Iraq with an unpopular war, many casualties, a bloated military that doesn't seem to get the job done, and secular infighting between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq. [[User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]]
I hope people realize that the very reason there are terrorists targeting America is directly because of its foreign policy. Maybe if American foreign policy didn't stick its nose where it didn't belong, we wouldn't have had a tremendous loss in Vietnam, countless nations vehemently loathing us due to the CIA deciding to destabilize them, and another tremendous loss in Iraq with an unpopular war, many casualties, a bloated military that doesn't seem to get the job done, and secular infighting between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq. [[User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]]
:: Bull cookies, America is a rightous nation. We lost Vietnam, was it a mistake? Then Korea was a mistake? If communism was left unchecked, do you think they would have kept attacking other nations? To have rogue nations replaced by democracies is a recipe for strength and peace. Allies instead of enemies. Those who bash the foreign policy of America is just nieve. We are still one of the only counties with individual liberties. Remove America from the picture and what do you have? --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:17, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
:: Bull cookies, America is a rightous nation. We lost Vietnam, was it a mistake? Then Korea was a mistake? If communism was left unchecked, do you think they would have kept attacking other nations? To have rogue nations replaced by democracies is a recipe for strength and peace. Allies instead of enemies. Those who bash the foreign policy of America is just nieve. We are still one of the only counties with individual liberties. Remove America from the picture and what do you have? --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:17, 21 April 2007 (EDT)