| | “For voters that appeared at the polls, those citizens were required to sign voter registrations, have those signatures checked against voter rolls, vote in a polling place monitored by statutorily-authorized poll observers, and have their votes counted in a transparent and verifiable open and observed manner. By contrast, due to the arbitrary, unauthorized, and standardless actions of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar, nearly 2.65 million votes were cast through a ‘mail-in’ process that lacked all of the hallmarks of transparency and verifiability that were present for in-person voters.”}} | | “For voters that appeared at the polls, those citizens were required to sign voter registrations, have those signatures checked against voter rolls, vote in a polling place monitored by statutorily-authorized poll observers, and have their votes counted in a transparent and verifiable open and observed manner. By contrast, due to the arbitrary, unauthorized, and standardless actions of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar, nearly 2.65 million votes were cast through a ‘mail-in’ process that lacked all of the hallmarks of transparency and verifiability that were present for in-person voters.”}} |
| − | [[File:Heat map analysis of PA mail ballots.png|right|300px|thumb|Heat map analysis of the origin of Pennsylvania mail ballots.<ref>https://www.bitchute.com/vidFile:Heat%20map%20analysis%20of%20PA%20mail%20ballots.pngeo/o8Lcby3ivYWy/?list=subscriptions</ref>]] | + | [[File:Heat map analysis of PA mail ballots.png|right|350px|thumb|Heat map analysis of the origin of Pennsylvania mail ballots.<ref>https://www.bitchute.com/vidFile:Heat%20map%20analysis%20of%20PA%20mail%20ballots.pngeo/o8Lcby3ivYWy/?list=subscriptions</ref>]] |
| | {{quotebox-float|“refused to require adequate verification of the voter’s identity. Rather than require votes to be received on the day of election, the Secretary permitted ballots received up to three days after the election to be counted without any evidence of timely mailing, such as a postmark. Finally, contrary to the in-person voting that is open and transparent to the parties and the candidates, Defendants permitted the review and counting of mail-in ballots largely in secret with no monitoring.” | | {{quotebox-float|“refused to require adequate verification of the voter’s identity. Rather than require votes to be received on the day of election, the Secretary permitted ballots received up to three days after the election to be counted without any evidence of timely mailing, such as a postmark. Finally, contrary to the in-person voting that is open and transparent to the parties and the candidates, Defendants permitted the review and counting of mail-in ballots largely in secret with no monitoring.” |