Changes

7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver."<ref>https://twitter.com/Wizard_Predicts/status/1326892069667950592</ref>  Officials in Fulton County Atlanta used a phony "burst pipe" narrative to halt vote counting and evacuate the absentee vote counting room of observers while a few workers remained behind alone with the tabulators.<ref>https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/slow-leak-text-messages-cast-doubt-on-georgia-officials-burst-pipe-excuse-for-pause-in-counting/news-story/19176f5113512210517c82debe684392</ref>

7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver."<ref>https://twitter.com/Wizard_Predicts/status/1326892069667950592</ref>  Officials in Fulton County Atlanta used a phony "burst pipe" narrative to halt vote counting and evacuate the absentee vote counting room of observers while a few workers remained behind alone with the tabulators.<ref>https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/slow-leak-text-messages-cast-doubt-on-georgia-officials-burst-pipe-excuse-for-pause-in-counting/news-story/19176f5113512210517c82debe684392</ref>

===2020 Democrat primaries===

==2020 Democrat primaries==

:{{See also|2020 Democrat primaries#Dominion Election Systems}}

:{{See also|2020 Democrat primaries#Dominion Election Systems}}

Jeff Carlson of ''[[The Epoch Times]]'' reported the findings of Harri Hursti, an acknowledged expert on electronic voting security.  Hursti provided a first-hand description of problems during the June 9, 2020 statewide primary election and runoff elections on August 11, 2020. Hursti summarized his findings:

Jeff Carlson of ''[[The Epoch Times]]'' reported the findings of Harri Hursti, an acknowledged expert on electronic voting security.  Hursti provided a first-hand description of problems during the June 9, 2020 statewide primary election and runoff elections on August 11, 2020. Hursti summarized his findings:

All of this raised material alarms for Hursti, who noted that  

All of this raised material alarms for Hursti, who noted that  

{{quotebox-float|“If in fact remote access was arranged and granted to the server, this has gravely serious implications for the security of the new Dominion system. Remote access, regardless how it is protected and organized is always a security risk, but furthermore it is transfer of control out of the physical perimeters and deny any ability to observe the activities.”<ref>https://themarketswork.com/2020/11/15/pre-election-concerns-over-dominion-voting-systems-highlighted-in-georgia-lawsuit/</ref>}}

{{quotebox-float|“If in fact remote access was arranged and granted to the server, this has gravely serious implications for the security of the new Dominion system. Remote access, regardless how it is protected and organized is always a security risk, but furthermore it is transfer of control out of the physical perimeters and deny any ability to observe the activities.”<ref>https://themarketswork.com/2020/11/15/pre-election-concerns-over-dominion-voting-systems-highlighted-in-georgia-lawsuit/</ref>}}

===Chain of custody for machines===

 

==Chain of custody for machines==

A poll worker testified specifically to the breach of the chain of custody of the voting machines the night before the election stating:

A poll worker testified specifically to the breach of the chain of custody of the voting machines the night before the election stating:

{{quotebox-float|"we typically receive the machines, the ballot marking devices – on the Friday before the election, with a chain of custody letter to be signed on Sunday, indicating that we had received the machines and the counts on the machines when received, and that the machines have been sealed. In this case, we were asked to sign the chain of custody letter on Sunday, even though the machines were not delivered until 2:00 AM in the morning on Election Day.  

{{quotebox-float|"we typically receive the machines, the ballot marking devices – on the Friday before the election, with a chain of custody letter to be signed on Sunday, indicating that we had received the machines and the counts on the machines when received, and that the machines have been sealed. In this case, we were asked to sign the chain of custody letter on Sunday, even though the machines were not delivered until 2:00 AM in the morning on Election Day.  

A voter fraud hearing in Georgia features explosive allegations of ballot stuffing. The witness said that after the observers left, the remaining workers "move[d] into action and began scanning ballots." This was allegedly not under any observation other than the surveillance cameras.<ref>https://youtu.be/nVP_60Hm4P8</ref>

A voter fraud hearing in Georgia features explosive allegations of ballot stuffing. The witness said that after the observers left, the remaining workers "move[d] into action and began scanning ballots." This was allegedly not under any observation other than the surveillance cameras.<ref>https://youtu.be/nVP_60Hm4P8</ref>

===No down ballot voting===

==No down ballot voting==

President Trump gained 2,432,799 votes, while the GOP Senate candidate tallied 2,433,617 votes. This is a difference of only 818 votes. Joe Biden in contrast gained 2,462,857 votes, while Osoff, a Democratic Senate candidate, tallied 2,373,560 votes.  This is a difference of 89,297 votes.  However, Hazel, a third party candidate, received 114,986 votes.

President Trump gained 2,432,799 votes, while the GOP Senate candidate tallied 2,433,617 votes. This is a difference of only 818 votes. Joe Biden in contrast gained 2,462,857 votes, while Osoff, a Democratic Senate candidate, tallied 2,373,560 votes.  This is a difference of 89,297 votes.  However, Hazel, a third party candidate, received 114,986 votes.

===Counterfeit ballots===

==Counterfeit ballots==

A poll worker testified they saw “counterfeit” ballots with darker colored watermarks that went 100% to Joe Biden.  When the Elections Director was alerted to the counterfeit ballots they brushed off concerns and said the watermarks were darker because of the use of different printers.  The poll worker testified about “the use of different paper for ballots, that would constitute fraud stating”:

A poll worker testified they saw “counterfeit” ballots with darker colored watermarks that went 100% to Joe Biden.  When the Elections Director was alerted to the counterfeit ballots they brushed off concerns and said the watermarks were darker because of the use of different printers.  The poll worker testified about “the use of different paper for ballots, that would constitute fraud stating”:

{{quotebox-float|I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.}}

{{quotebox-float|I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.}}

In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.”<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/georgia-lawsuit-witness-testifies-use-different-paper-counterfeit-ballots-watermark-solid-grey-instead-transparent-100-joe-biden/</ref>}}

In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.”<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/georgia-lawsuit-witness-testifies-use-different-paper-counterfeit-ballots-watermark-solid-grey-instead-transparent-100-joe-biden/</ref>}}

===Ineligible voters===

==Ineligible voters==

132,000 ineligible voters were identified in Fulton county.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-breaking-news-georgia-132000-ballots-fulton-county-georgia-identified-likely-ineligible/</ref>

132,000 ineligible voters were identified in Fulton county.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-breaking-news-georgia-132000-ballots-fulton-county-georgia-identified-likely-ineligible/</ref>

===Signature rejecion rate===

==Signature rejecion rate==

In Georgia, the signature verification requirement was a dead letter. The signature rejection rate announced by the Secretary of State was 0.15%. The signature rejection rate for absentee ballot applications was .00167% - only 30 statewide. Hancock County, Georgia, 86 population 8,348, rejected nine absentee ballot applications for signature mismatch. Fulton County rejected eight. No other metropolitan county in Georgia rejected even a single absentee ballot application for signature mismatch.

In Georgia, the signature verification requirement was a dead letter. The signature rejection rate announced by the Secretary of State was 0.15%. The signature rejection rate for absentee ballot applications was .00167% - only 30 statewide. Hancock County, Georgia, 86 population 8,348, rejected nine absentee ballot applications for signature mismatch. Fulton County rejected eight. No other metropolitan county in Georgia rejected even a single absentee ballot application for signature mismatch.

===Dead people voting===

==Dead people voting==

27,000 90-year-olds and 2,000 100 year-olds were registered to vote.<ref>https://www.dickmorris.com/category/lunchtime-videos/</ref>

27,000 90-year-olds and 2,000 100 year-olds were registered to vote.<ref>https://www.dickmorris.com/category/lunchtime-videos/</ref>

===First recount===

==First recount==

Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles, a veteran poll worker of 20 years testified some of the most significant improprieties she witnessed participating in the recount, which Joe Biden supposedly won by around 13,000 votes.  Voyles described counting an unusual “pristine” batch of [[absentee ballot]]s that were cast 98% for Joe Biden. She states that the chain of custody of these absentee ballots was unsigned.

Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles, a veteran poll worker of 20 years testified some of the most significant improprieties she witnessed participating in the recount, which Joe Biden supposedly won by around 13,000 votes.  Voyles described counting an unusual “pristine” batch of [[absentee ballot]]s that were cast 98% for Joe Biden. She states that the chain of custody of these absentee ballots was unsigned.

{{quotebox|“We came to one batch- it was surprising, it was stark- having done this for years, I’m very familiar with how the ballots work, how they fold, how they feel, their general appearance- these ballots appeared as though the first one had been bubbled in by a person and all of them were replicated, exactly the same.

{{quotebox|“We came to one batch- it was surprising, it was stark- having done this for years, I’m very familiar with how the ballots work, how they fold, how they feel, their general appearance- these ballots appeared as though the first one had been bubbled in by a person and all of them were replicated, exactly the same.