Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Standing (view source)

Revision as of 00:14, December 12, 2020

176 bytes added ,  00:14, December 12, 2020
In cases having political significance, it is common for an evenly divided court to find that a liberal plaintiff has standing, while a conservative plaintiff does not.
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Standing''' is the legal right to bring a lawsuit. Only a person with something actually at stake in a dispute has standing to bring a lawsuit.  In federal court, legal standing is required by Article III, Section 2 of the [[U.S. Constitution]], which requires existence of a real case or controversy rather than a merely hypothetical dispute.
+
'''Standing''' is the legal right to bring a lawsuit. Only a person with something actually at stake in a dispute has standing to bring a lawsuit.  In federal court, legal standing is required by Article III, Section 2 of the [[U.S. Constitution]], which requires existence of a real case or controversy rather than a merely hypothetical dispute.
 +
 
 +
In cases having political significance, it is common for an evenly divided court to find that a [[liberal]] plaintiff has standing, while a [[conservative]] plaintiff does not.
    
The Supreme Court has summarized this rule as follows:
 
The Supreme Court has summarized this rule as follows:
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1712703"

Navigation menu