Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
a start
In ''Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA'', the 5-4 [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[standing]] did not exist to challenge the [[NSA]]'s eavesdropping program.

The Court held that the standing inquiry is particularly rigorous when reaching the merits of the dispute "would force [the Court] to decide whether an action taken by one of the other two branches of the Federal Government was unconstitutional." 133 S. Ct. 1138, 1147 (2013) (quoting ''Raines v. Byrd'', 521 U.S. 811, 819-20 (1997)).
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits

Navigation menu